Improving medication-related clinical decision support
Open accessAbstract
Current uses of medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) and recommendations for improving these systems are reviewed. Using a systematic approach, articles published from 2007 through 2014 were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using MeSH terms and keywords relating to the 5 basic medication-related CDS functionalities. A total of 156 full-text articles and 28 conference abstracts were reviewed across each of the 5 areas: drug–drug interaction (DDI) checks (n = 78), drug allergy checks (n = 20), drug dose support (n = 55), drug duplication checks (n = 11), and drug formulary support (n = 20). The success of medication-related CDS depends on users finding the alerts valuable and acting on the information received. Improving alert specificity and sensitivity is important for all domains. Tiering is important for improving the acceptance of DDI alerts. The ability to perform appropriate cross-sensitivity checks is key to producing appropriate drug allergy checks. Drug dosage alerts should be individualized and deliver practical recommendations. How the system is configured to identify certain drug duplications is important to prevent possible patient toxicity. Accurate knowledge databases are needed to produce relevant drug formulary alerts and encourage formulary adherence. Medication-related CDS is still relatively immature in some organizations and has substantial room for improvement. For example, decision support should consider more patient-specific factors, human factors principles should always be considered, and alert specificity must be improved in order to reduce alert fatigue. Standardization, integration of patient-specific parameters, and consideration of human factors design principles are central to realizing the potential benefits of medication-related CDS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different studies have shown a substantial reduction in DDI alert burden by applying patient and context-specific factors.
“Different studies have shown a substantial reduction in DDI alert burden by applying patient and context-specific factors [14–18].”
From Overall performance of a drug–drug interaction clinical decision support system: quantitative evaluation and end-user survey (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events
Bates, D. W., Boyle, D. L., Vliet, M. B. V., Schneider, J., & Leape, L. (1995) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02600255 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
Self-citationOverrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients
Nanji, K. C., Slight, S. P., Seger, D. L., Cho, I., Fiskio, J. M., Redden, L. M., Volk, L. A., & Bates, D. W. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001813 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationComprehensive Analysis of a Medication Dosing Error Related to CPOE: Table 1
Horsky, J., Kuperman, G. J., & Patel, V. L. (2005) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1740 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Pearson, S.-A., Moxey, A., Robertson, J., Hains, I., Williamson, M., Reeve, J., & Newby, D. (2009) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-154 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Slight, S. P., Seger, D. L., Nanji, K. C., Cho, I., Maniam, N., Dykes, P. C., & Bates, D. W. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085071 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalysis of overridden alerts in a drug-drug interaction detection system
Mille, F., Schwartz, C., Brion, F., Fontan, J.-E., Bourdon, O., Degoulet, P., & Jaulent, M.-C. (2008) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn038 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Olakotan, O. O., & Mohd Yusof, M. (2021) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582211007536 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Edrees, H., Amato, M. G., Wong, A., Seger, D. L., & Bates, D. W. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa034 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationVan De Sijpe, G., Quintens, C., Walgraeve, K., Van Laer, E., Penny, J., De Vlieger, G., Schrijvers, R., De Munter, P., Foulon, V., Casteels, M., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01783-z · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tolley, C. L., Slight, S. P., Husband, A. K., Watson, N., & Bates, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Slight, Sarah P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-15
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 239-246
- ISSN
- 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-2900
- OpenAlex
- W2789922031
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- drug-drug interaction alerts, drug allergy alerts, alarm fatigue, human factors design, knowledge base
- MeSH terms
- Drug Interactions, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Medication Errors, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Medical Order Entry Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review