Cited by 105Electronic Health Records SystemsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Improving medication-related clinical decision support

Open access
Tolley, Clare L., Slight, Sarah P., Husband, Andrew K., Watson, Neil, Bates, David W.·2018·American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract

Current uses of medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) and recommendations for improving these systems are reviewed. Using a systematic approach, articles published from 2007 through 2014 were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE using MeSH terms and keywords relating to the 5 basic medication-related CDS functionalities. A total of 156 full-text articles and 28 conference abstracts were reviewed across each of the 5 areas: drug–drug interaction (DDI) checks (n = 78), drug allergy checks (n = 20), drug dose support (n = 55), drug duplication checks (n = 11), and drug formulary support (n = 20). The success of medication-related CDS depends on users finding the alerts valuable and acting on the information received. Improving alert specificity and sensitivity is important for all domains. Tiering is important for improving the acceptance of DDI alerts. The ability to perform appropriate cross-sensitivity checks is key to producing appropriate drug allergy checks. Drug dosage alerts should be individualized and deliver practical recommendations. How the system is configured to identify certain drug duplications is important to prevent possible patient toxicity. Accurate knowledge databases are needed to produce relevant drug formulary alerts and encourage formulary adherence. Medication-related CDS is still relatively immature in some organizations and has substantial room for improvement. For example, decision support should consider more patient-specific factors, human factors principles should always be considered, and alert specificity must be improved in order to reduce alert fatigue. Standardization, integration of patient-specific parameters, and consideration of human factors design principles are central to realizing the potential benefits of medication-related CDS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2146/ajhp160830

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolley, C. L., Slight, S. P., Husband, A. K., Watson, N., & Bates, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Slight, Sarah P.
Venue
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
239-246
ISSN
  • 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-2900
OpenAlex
W2789922031
Cited by
105
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
drug-drug interaction alerts, drug allergy alerts, alarm fatigue, human factors design, knowledge base
MeSH terms
Drug Interactions, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Medication Errors, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Medical Order Entry Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review