Real-World Characterization of Women with Diagnosed Endometriosis Initiating Therapy with Elagolix Using a US Claims Database
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist approved in the United States for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. We performed a real-world evaluation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis who were initiating elagolix therapy in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort database analysis included women 18-49 years of age with ≥1 pharmacy claim for elagolix between August 2018 and December 2019 from the Copyright © 2020 Truven Health Analytics LLC. All Rights Reserved. Women had continuous medical and pharmacy health plan enrollment during the baseline period (year immediately preceding the index date [date of earliest elagolix claim]) and had ≥1 medical claim with endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9/10 code [617.x and N80.x]) on or before the index date. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, ICD code-based endometriosis anatomic site, endometriosis-related treatments, and pain symptoms were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: The study included 2083 patients with mean age at baseline of 33.2 ± 8.1 years. Comorbidities most commonly recorded were non-cancer, non-endometriosis pain (59.5%), including arthritis/joint pain (43.7%) and back/neck pain (31.7%), and mental disorder (40.7%), including anxiety (32.7%). The majority of endometriosis diagnosis codes recorded referred to unspecified location (52.3%) and pelvic peritoneum (23.0%); 61.0% of patients received a medical endometriosis-related treatment in the baseline period, with the most common treatments being contraceptives (various routes of administration, 40.2%) and progestins (31.7%). Additionally, 35.4% of the patients received an endometriosis-related surgery during baseline, with the most common being laparoscopy (33.2% of all patients). Opioids were used during the baseline period by 57.3% of the patients. For pain symptoms, 71.5%, 30.4%, and 19.3% of the patients had claims for pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis therapies were used by a significant proportion of patients with endometriosis in the year immediately preceding elagolix initiation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Second-line therapies (injectable depot GnRH agonists) are associated with bothersome menopausal symptoms.
“second-line therapies (injectable depot formulations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists), which are only proposed in case of OCP or progestogen failure, are associated with bothersome menopausal symptoms.”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
First-line medical therapies (OCPs and progestogens) demonstrate limited long-term efficacy.
“these first-line medical therapies demonstrate limited long-term efficacy”
From Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 15
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [7]National Guidance Alliance (UK). Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2017 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0096947/. Accessed 3 12, 2020.
- Authors
- Surrey, E. S., Soliman, A. M., Johns, B., Vora, J. B., Taylor, H. S., & Agarwal, S. K.
- Affiliations
- Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (US)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Surrey, Eric S
- Venue
- ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- Volume 12
- Pages
- 473-479
- ISSN
- 1178-6981 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7456657
- OpenAlex
- W3081515126
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Keywords
- elagolix, endometriosis, GnRH antagonist, real-world evidence, endometriosis-associated pain, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, comorbidities, opioid use, endometriosis surgery, laparoscopy, progestins, contraceptives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review