Cited by 32Muscle Physiology and DisordersAdipose Tissue and MetabolismNutrition and Health in Aging

Eight Weeks of High-Intensity Interval Static Strength Training Improves Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and Motor Function in Aged Rats via the PGC-1α/FNDC5/UCP1 Pathway

Open access
Liu, Yijie, Guo, Chaoyang, Liu, Shuting, Zhang, Shuai, Mao, Yun, Fang, Lei·2021·Clinical Interventions in Aging

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. Most studies have focused on dynamic resistance exercises for preventing muscular decline and maintaining the muscle strength of older individuals. However, this training mode is impractical for older people with osteoarthritis and a limited range of motion. The static strength training mode is more suitable for older people. Therefore, a determination of the effect and mechanism of static strength training on sarcopenia is critical. METHODS: In this study, we developed a training device designed to collect training data and evaluate the effects of static training on the upper limbs of rats. The expression of PGC-1α was locally blocked by injecting a siRNA at the midpoint of the biceps to determine whether PGC-1α signal transduction participates in the effects of high-intensity interval static training on muscle strength. Then, the rat's motor capacity was measured after static strength training. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were applied to determine PGC-1α/FNDC5/UCP1 expression levels in the muscle and adipose tissue. The serum irisin level was also detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Increased levels of serum irisin and local expression of FNDC5, PGC-1α, and UCP1 were observed in the biceps brachii and surrounding fatty tissue after static strength training. Static strength training showed an advantage in reducing body weight and white fat accumulation while increasing the muscle fiber volume, which resulted in a longer training time and shorter rest time. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results indicated that high-intensity interval static training prevents skeletal muscle atrophy and improves the motor function of aged rats through the PGC-1α/FNDC5/UCP1 signaling pathway.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/cia.s308893

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-intensity interval static strength training in aged rats increased muscle fiber volume, prevented atrophy, and improved motor function via the PGC-1α/FNDC5/UCP1 signaling pathway, leading to elevated circulating irisin and stimulating white-to-brown fat conversion.

    “a high-intensity interval static strength training (eight weeks) program in aged rats increased the muscle fiber volume, prevented atrophy, and improved motor function via the PGC-1α/FNDC5/UCP1 signaling pathway, leading to elevated circulating levels of irisin and subsequently stimulating the conversion of white fat into brown fat (Figure 1) [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 32

Authors
Liu, Y., Guo, C., Liu, S., Zhang, S., Mao, Y., & Fang, L.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fang, Lei
Venue
Clinical Interventions in Aging
Published
2021-05
Volume
Volume 16
Pages
811-821
ISSN
  • 1176-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-1998
OpenAlex
W3161780658
Cited by
32
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Interventions in Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
sarcopenia, skeletal muscle atrophy, high-intensity interval training, PGC-1α, FNDC5, irisin, UCP1, motor function, aging, biceps brachii, white adipose tissue, siRNA knockdown, training device
MeSH terms
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha, Uncoupling Protein 1, High-Intensity Interval Training, Aging, Animals, Atrophy, Body Weight, Fibronectins, Male, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Transcription Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, RNA, Small Interfering, Rats, Adipose Tissue, White, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review