The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis of Chest Wall Tuberculosis Using Fine Needle Aspiration: A Single-Center Experience
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive diagnosis of chest wall tuberculosis remains a challenge. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a simple and safe method of sampling. However, previous studies have shown that conventional tuberculosis tests had poor diagnostic performance in the needle aspirates. With the popularization of molecular detection application, the value of FNA in the diagnosis of chest wall tuberculosis needs to be reevaluated. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with suspected chest wall tuberculosis at admission who underwent FNA for diagnosis and reported the diagnostic efficacy of acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, cytology and Xpert MTB/RIF (GeneXpert) when testing FNA specimens. A composite reference standard (CRS) was used as the diagnostic gold standard for this study. Results: Among 89 included FNA specimens, acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, and GeneXpert were positive in 15 (16.85%), 23 (25.8%), and 61 (68.5%), respectively. Thirty-nine (43.8%) had cytologic features suggestive of tuberculosis. According to CRS, 75 (84.3%) cases were categorized as chest wall tuberculosis, 14 (15.7%) were not diagnosed with tuberculosis. Using CRS as the gold standard, acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, cytology and GeneXpert exhibited sensitivity of 20%, 30.7%, 52% and 81.3%, respectively. Specificity in these four tests was found to be 100%. Sensitivity of GeneXpert was significantly higher than that of smear, culture and cytology, X 2 =66.3, p < 0.001. Conclusion: GeneXpert achieved higher sensitivity as compared to cytology and conventional TB tests in the chest wall FNA specimens. The implementation of GeneXpert may increase the diagnostic efficacy of FNA in the diagnosis of chest wall TB. Keywords: chest wall tuberculosis, fine needle aspiration, Xpert MTB/RIF, cytology, culture
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“FNAC and the histopathological exam are commonly used, if not gold standard, diagnostic tools [29,31].”
From Head and Neck Tuberculosis: A Rare Diagnosis and the Role of Surgical Biopsy and Histopathological Evaluation in Extrapulmonary Disease (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chakaya, J. M., Khan, M. S., Ntoumi, F., Aklillu, E., Fatima, R., Mwaba, P., Kapata, N., Mfinanga, S., Hasnain, S. E., Katoto, P. D., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.107 · Cited by 1,107
Lawn, S. D., & Nicol, M. P. (2011) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.11.84 · Cited by 505
Al‐Soud, W. A., Jönsson, L. J., & Rådström, P. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.1.345-350.2000 · Cited by 372
Epidemiology of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis among Inpatients, China, 2008–2017
Pang, Y., An, J., Shu, W., Huo, F., Chu, N., Gao, M., Qin, S., Huang, H., Chen, X., & Xu, S. (2019) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2503.180572 · Cited by 285
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the European Union and European Economic Area, 2002 to 2011
Sandgren, A., Hollo, V., & van der Werf, M. J. (2013) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/ese.18.12.20431-en · Cited by 234
Kohli, M., Schiller, I., Dendukuri, N., Yao, M., Dheda, K., Denkinger, C. M., Schumacher, S. G., & Steingart, K. R. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012768.pub3 · Cited by 215
Quantitative studies of mycobacterial populations in sputum and saliva.
Yeager, H., Lacy, J., Smith, L. R., & LeMaistre, C. A. (1967) · PubMed · doi:10.1164/arrd.1967.95.6.998 · Cited by 196
Enumeration of Tubercle Bacilli in Sputum of Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Hobby, G. L., Holman, A. P., Iseman, M. D., & Jones, J. M. (1973) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.4.2.94 · Cited by 172
Scott, L. E., Beylis, N., Nicol, M. P., Nkuna, G., Molapo, S., Berrie, L., Duse, A. G., & Stevens, W. S. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.03553-13 · Cited by 114
VanderLaan, P. A. (2016) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.21742 · Cited by 109
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Majeed, 2021, J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 33, 357
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, Z.-K., Wu, Z., Ye, T., Lin, C.-Y., & Guo, X. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321507 · Cited by 8
Mogoantă, C. A., Osman, A., Georgescu, A.-M., Mitroi, A. M., Busuioc, C. I., Tănase, I., Cioboată, R., Liliac, I. M., Cimpeanu, O. L., & Ciolofan, M. S. (2025) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens14050479 · Cited by 2
“FNAC and the histopathological exam are commonly used, if not gold standard, diagnostic tools [29,31].”
Yan, Q.-H., Chi, J., Zhang, L., Xue, F., Cui, J., & Kong, H. L. (2023) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6698 · Cited by 1
Hutapea, R. R., & Lina, J. (2025) · Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia · doi:10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i9.61736
Talib, A. L., & Rashid, R. Y. R. (2025) · Iraqi journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.22578/ijms.23.2.21
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., & Sha, W.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Wenting
- Sha, Wei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Infection and Drug Resistance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- Volume 16
- Pages
- 2281-2290
- ISSN
- 1178-6973 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10122463
- OpenAlex
- W4366085009
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Infection and Drug Resistance (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center (19MC1910800)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
- Keywords
- chest wall tuberculosis, fine-needle aspiration, Xpert MTB/RIF, acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, cytology, diagnostic sensitivity, composite reference standard
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review