CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toxicity studies of six types of carbon nanoparticles in a chicken-embryo model

Kurantowicz, Natalia, Sawosz, Ewa, Halik, Gabriela, Strojny, Barbara, Hotowy, Anna, Grodzik, Marta, Piast, Radosław, Pasanphan, Wanvimol, Chwalibog, André·2017·International Journal of Nanomedicine
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s131960PMC PMC5391155
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s131960

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Nanoparticles were visualized using transmission electron microscopy (A, C, E, G, I, K) and a digital camera (B, D, F, H, J, L). Note: Nanoparticles of diamond (A, B), graphite (C, D), pristine graphene (E, F), small graphene oxide (G, H), large graphene oxide (I, J), and reduced graphene oxide (K, L).
Figure 1 Nanoparticles were visualized using transmission electron microscopy (A, C, E, G, I, K) and a digital camera (B, D, F, H, J, L). Note: Nanoparticles of diamond (A, B), graphite (C, D), pristine graphene (E, F), small graphene oxide (G, H), large graphene oxide (I, J), and reduced graphene oxide (K, L).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Room-temperature Fourier transform infrared spectra. Note: Nanoparticles of diamond (A), graphite (B), pristine graphene (C), small graphene oxide (D), large graphene oxide (E), and reduced graphene oxide (F).
Figure 2 Room-temperature Fourier transform infrared spectra. Note: Nanoparticles of diamond (A), graphite (B), pristine graphene (C), small graphene oxide (D), large graphene oxide (E), and reduced graphene oxide (F).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Chicken-embryo development after 10 (A), 15 (B), and 20 (C) days of incubation. Abbreviations: DNPs, diamond nanoparticles; GNPs, graphite nanoparticles; pG, pristine graphene; sGO, small graphene oxide; lGO, large graphene oxide; rGO, reduced graphene oxide.
Figure 3 Chicken-embryo development after 10 (A), 15 (B), and 20 (C) days of incubation. Abbreviations: DNPs, diamond nanoparticles; GNPs, graphite nanoparticles; pG, pristine graphene; sGO, small graphene oxide; lGO, large graphene oxide; rGO, reduced graphene oxide.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Red blood-cell morphology by light microscopy. Note: Placebo (A) and nanoparticles of diamond (B), graphite (C), pristine graphene (D), small graphene oxide (E), large graphene oxide (F), and reduced graphene oxide (G).
Figure 4 Red blood-cell morphology by light microscopy. Note: Placebo (A) and nanoparticles of diamond (B), graphite (C), pristine graphene (D), small graphene oxide (E), large graphene oxide (F), and reduced graphene oxide (G).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) in chicken-embryo liver lysate (nmol/mg protein). Notes: Data are presented as averages of multiple determinations (n=4), with error bars representing standard deviation. Differences were not significant (P>0.05). Abbreviations: Pl, placebo; DNPs, diamond nanoparticles; GNPs, graphite nanoparticles; pG, pristine graphene; sGO, small graphene oxide; lGO, large graphene oxide; rGO, reduced graphene oxide.
Figure 5 Concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) in chicken-embryo liver lysate (nmol/mg protein). Notes: Data are presented as averages of multiple determinations (n=4), with error bars representing standard deviation. Differences were not significant (P>0.05). Abbreviations: Pl, placebo; DNPs, diamond nanoparticles; GNPs, graphite nanoparticles; pG, pristine graphene; sGO, small graphene oxide; lGO, large graphene oxide; rGO, reduced graphene oxide.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [2]Geim AK Novoselov KS The rise of graphene Nat Mater 2007 6 183 191 17330084
  2. [4]Kurantowicz N Sawosz E Jaworski S Interaction of graphene family materials with Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica Nanoscale Res Lett 2015 10 23 25685114 PMC4312314
  3. [5]Jaworski S Sawosz E Kutwin M In vitro and in vivo effects of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide on glioblastoma Int J Nanomedicine 2015 10 1585 1596 25759581 PMC4346365
  4. [7]Williams OA Hees J Dieker C Jäger W Kirste L Nebel CE Size-dependent reactivity of diamond nanoparticles ACS Nano 2010 4 4824 4830 20731457
  5. [10]Jastrzębska AM Kurtycz P Olszyna AR Recent advances in graphene family materials toxicity investigations J Nanopart Res 2012 14 1320 23239936 PMC3517804
  6. [11]Celá P Veselá B Matalová E Večeřa Z Buchtová M Embryonic toxicity of nanoparticles Cells Tissues Organs 2014 199 1 23 24903755
  7. [12]Stern CD The chick: a great model system becomes even greater Dev Cell 2005 8 9 17 15621526
  8. [13]Vergara MN Canto-Soler MV Rediscovering the chick embryo as a model to study retinal development Neural Dev 2012 7 1 19 22738172 PMC3541172
  9. [14]Wolpert L Much more from the chicken’s egg than breakfast: a wonderful model system Mech Dev 2004 121 1015 1017 15296967
  10. [15]Hamburger V Hamilton HL A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo Dev Dyn 1992 195 231 272 1304821
  11. [16]Sawosz E Jaworski S Kutwin M Toxicity of pristine graphene in experiments in a chicken embryo model Int J Nanomedicine 2014 9 3913 3922 25152621 PMC4140706
  12. [17]Szmidt M Sawosz E Urbańska K Toxicity of different forms of graphene in a chicken embryo model Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2016 23 19940 19948 27436378
  13. [18]Strojny B Grodzik M Sawosz E Diamond nanoparticles modify curcumin activity: in vitro studies on cancer and normal cells and in ovo studies on chicken embryo model PLoS One 2016 11 e0164637 27736939 PMC5063465
  14. [19]Roman D Yasmeen A Mireuta M Stiharu I Al Moustafa AE Significant toxic role for single-walled carbon nanotubes during normal embryogenesis Nanomedicine 2013 9 945 950 23563045
  15. [24]Mu L Gao Y Hu X L-cysteine: a biocompatible, breathable and beneficial coating for graphene oxide Biomaterials 2015 52 301 311 25818436
  16. [25]Tsai LW Lin YC Perevedentseva E Lugovtsov A Priezzhev A Cheng CL Nanodiamonds for medical applications: interaction with blood in vitro and in vivo Int J Mol Sci 2016 17 1111 PMC4964486 27420044
  17. [26]Holt BD Shawky JH Dahl KN Davidson LA Islam MF Distribution of single wall carbon nanotubes in the Xenopus laevis embryo after microinjection J Appl Toxicol 2016 36 568 578 26510384 PMC4943752
  18. [28]Lin YC Wu KT Lin ZR Nanodiamond for biolabelling and toxicity evaluation in the zebrafish embryo in vivo J Biophotonics 2016 9 827 836 27093912
  19. [29]Kurantowicz N Strojny B Sawosz E Biodistribution of a high dose of diamond, graphite, and graphene oxide nanoparticles after multiple intraperitoneal injections in rats Nanoscale Res Lett 2015 10 398 26459428 PMC4602018
  20. [34]Paredes JI Villar-Rodil S Martínez-Alonso A Tascón JM Graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents Langmuir 2008 24 10560 10564 18759411
  21. [37]Strojny B Kurantowicz N Sawosz E Long term influence of carbon nanoparticles on health and liver status in rats PLoS One 2015 10 e0144821 26657282 PMC4681315
  22. [39]Li Z Wang C Tian L An embryo of protocells: the capsule of graphene with selective ion channels Sci Rep 2015 5 10258 25989440 PMC4437305
  23. [40]Sawosz E Jaworski S Kutwin M Graphene functionalized with arginine decreases the development of glioblastoma multiforme tumor in a gene-dependent manner Int J Mol Sci 2015 16 25214 25233 26512645 PMC4632799
  24. [42]Baumann R Dragon S Erythropoiesis and red cell function in vertebrate embryos Eur J Clin Invest 2005 35 Suppl 3 2 12 16281952
  25. [43]Zon LI Developmental biology of hematopoiesis Blood 1995 86 2876 2891 7579378
  26. [45]Lin YC Tsai LW Perevedentseva E The influence of nanodiamond on the oxygenation states and micro rheological properties of human red blood cells in vitro J Biomed Opt 2012 17 101512 23223988
  27. [46]Puzyr AP Tarskikh SV Makarskaya GV Damaging effect of detonation diamonds on human white and red blood cells in vitro Dokl Biochem Biophys 2002 385 201 204 12469682
  28. [47]Puzyr AP Neshumayev DA Tarskikh SV Makarskaya GV Dolmatov VY Bondar VS Destruction of human blood cells in interaction with detonation nanodiamonds in experiments in vitro Diam Relat Mater 2004 13 2020 2023 15759508
  29. [49]Garcia-Alegria E Iluit M Stefanska M Graphene oxide promotes embryonic stem cell differentiation to haematopoietic lineage Sci Rep 2016 6 25917 27197878 PMC4873758
  30. [50]Wang A Pu K Dong B Role of surface charge and oxidative stress in cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of graphene oxide towards human lung fibroblast cells J Appl Toxicol 2013 33 1156 1164 23775274

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Kurantowicz, N., Sawosz, E., Halik, G., Strojny, B., Hotowy, A., Grodzik, M., Piast, R., Pasanphan, W., & Chwalibog, A.
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-04
Volume
Volume 12
Pages
2887-2898
ISSN
1178-2013
DOI
10.2147/ijn.s131960
PMC
PMC5391155
Cited by
39
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity studies of six types of carbon nanoparticles in a chicken-embryo model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/ijn.s131960
The paper
Kurantowicz, N., Sawosz, E., Halik, G., Strojny, B., Hotowy, A., Grodzik, M., Piast, R., Pasanphan, W., & Chwalibog, A. (2017). Toxicity studies of six types of carbon nanoparticles in a chicken-embryo model. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s131960