Cited by 41Nanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mitochondria-Targeted Mesoporous Titanium Dioxide Nanoplatform for Synergistic Nitric Oxide Gas-Sonodynamic Therapy of Breast Cancer

Open access
Zuo, Shuting, Zhang, Yan, Wang, Zhenyu, Wang, Jing·2022·International Journal of Nanomedicine

Abstract

Background: Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) has rapidly advanced as a promising alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy owing to its preferable therapeutic depth. However, single-modal SDT exhibits limited efficacy due to the long-term hypoxia in tumors. Method and Results: To address these issues, we proposed a synergistic SDT strategy that integrates mitochondrial targeting with nitric oxide (NO) gas therapy by using multifunctional nanoplatforms. The nanoplatform, which was named as T-mTNPs@L-Arg, was composed of mesoporous titanium dioxide loaded with the NO donor precursor L-arginine (L-Arg) and modified with triphenyl phosphonium (TPP), a mitochondria-targeting ligand. Therefore, T-mTNPs@L-Arg could efficiently concentrate into mitochondria and release NO gas as well as generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) with ultrasound stimulus. Importantly, the released NO gas exerted multiple synergies with SDT, including inducing NO poisoning, generating more lethal reactive nitrogen species (RNS) by reaction with ROS, and alleviating hypoxia through NO-mediated mitochondrial respiration inhibition. On account of the synergistic effects, T-mTNPs@L-Arg showed an outstanding SDT efficacy and a reduced side effect. Conclusion: This work designed a nanoplatform to integrate mitochondria targeting, SDT and NO gas therapy, providing a new strategy for highly efficient breast cancer therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s348618

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Scheme 1 Schematic illustration of mitochondria-targeted mesoporous titanium dioxide nanoparticles with L-arginine loading for synergistic nitric oxide gas-sonodynamic therapy.
Scheme 1 Schematic illustration of mitochondria-targeted mesoporous titanium dioxide nanoparticles with L-arginine loading for synergistic nitric oxide gas-sonodynamic therapy.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 1 Characterization of T-mTNPs: (A) TEM images of mTNPs, scale bar=30 nm, (B) DLS analysis of mTNPs, (C) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of mTNPs, (D) Pore size distribution of mTNPs, (E) UV−vis absorption spectra, (F) L-Arg release profiles of T-mTNPs@L-Arg under different pH value, (G) Cumulative NO generation at different pH at the presence or absence of H2O2, (H) ROS generation detected by DPBF probe, (I) fluorescence spectrum of ONOO− detected by DHR probe.
Figure 1 Characterization of T-mTNPs: (A) TEM images of mTNPs, scale bar=30 nm, (B) DLS analysis of mTNPs, (C) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of mTNPs, (D) Pore size distribution of mTNPs, (E) UV−vis absorption spectra, (F) L-Arg release profiles of T-mTNPs@L-Arg under different pH value, (G) Cumulative NO generation at different pH at the presence or absence of H2O2, (H) ROS generation detected by DPBF probe, (I) fluorescence spectrum of ONOO− detected by DHR probe.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Mitochondria targeting and hypoxia relief: (A) Confocal microscope images of MCF-7 cells after incubated with FITC-labeled T-mTNPs@L-Arg and mTNPs@L-Arg and stained with Hoechst 33258 and MitoTracker, scale bar=10 nm (B) FITC fluorescence intensity of isolated mitochondria from MCF-7 cells after incubated with FITC-labeled T-mTNPs@L-Arg and mTNPs@L-Arg. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus the mTNPs@L-Arg (C) Activity of Cco after various treatments. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (D) Relative dissolved oxygen content in the cell medium of various groups. (E) Hypoxic status of MCF-7 cells detected by hypoxia red detection reagent l, scale bar=10 nm.
Figure 2 Mitochondria targeting and hypoxia relief: (A) Confocal microscope images of MCF-7 cells after incubated with FITC-labeled T-mTNPs@L-Arg and mTNPs@L-Arg and stained with Hoechst 33258 and MitoTracker, scale bar=10 nm (B) FITC fluorescence intensity of isolated mitochondria from MCF-7 cells after incubated with FITC-labeled T-mTNPs@L-Arg and mTNPs@L-Arg. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus the mTNPs@L-Arg (C) Activity of Cco after various treatments. The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (D) Relative dissolved oxygen content in the cell medium of various groups. (E) Hypoxic status of MCF-7 cells detected by hypoxia red detection reagent l, scale bar=10 nm.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 In Vitro SDT efficacy of T-mTNPs@L-Arg. (A) The destruction of mitochondria in MCF-7 cells after various treatments detected by CLSM, scale bar=10 nm. Cytotoxicity of different nanoparticles towards MCF-7 cells in the absence (B) or presence (C) of US stimulus. (D) Cell viability of hypoxic MCF-7 cells after treated with different nanoparticles in the presence of US. (E) CLSM images of MCF-7 cells stained with DCFH-DA in various groups, scale bar=10 nm. (F) ROS generation in various groups detected by FACS (“H” represents hypoxia). The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).
Figure 3 In Vitro SDT efficacy of T-mTNPs@L-Arg. (A) The destruction of mitochondria in MCF-7 cells after various treatments detected by CLSM, scale bar=10 nm. Cytotoxicity of different nanoparticles towards MCF-7 cells in the absence (B) or presence (C) of US stimulus. (D) Cell viability of hypoxic MCF-7 cells after treated with different nanoparticles in the presence of US. (E) CLSM images of MCF-7 cells stained with DCFH-DA in various groups, scale bar=10 nm. (F) ROS generation in various groups detected by FACS (“H” represents hypoxia). The data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4 In Vivo SDT efficacy of T-mTNPs@L-Arg. (A) Biodistribution of T-mTNPs@L-Arg in MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection at different time points. (B) Immunofluorescence images of tumors in various treatments on day 6. Tumor hypoxia was detected by Pimonidazole binding of HIF-1α antibody staining, scale bar=50 nm. (C) FACS assay of hypoxic area in tumor tissues. *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (D) Tumor photographs. (E) Tumor volume. *p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (F) Tumor weight. *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. All the data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).
Figure 4 In Vivo SDT efficacy of T-mTNPs@L-Arg. (A) Biodistribution of T-mTNPs@L-Arg in MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection at different time points. (B) Immunofluorescence images of tumors in various treatments on day 6. Tumor hypoxia was detected by Pimonidazole binding of HIF-1α antibody staining, scale bar=50 nm. (C) FACS assay of hypoxic area in tumor tissues. *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (D) Tumor photographs. (E) Tumor volume. *p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. (F) Tumor weight. *p < 0.05 versus the control groups, #p < 0.05 versus mTNPs@L-Arg. All the data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Evaluation of the systemic toxicity: (A) body weight. (B–E) blood biochemistry indicators include (B) alanine aminotransferase (ALT), (C) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), (D) blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and (E) creatinine (CRE). Data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).
Figure 5 Evaluation of the systemic toxicity: (A) body weight. (B–E) blood biochemistry indicators include (B) alanine aminotransferase (ALT), (C) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), (D) blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and (E) creatinine (CRE). Data are presented as the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 6 H&E staining images of the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney from mice in various treatments, scale bar=100 nm.
Figure 6 H&E staining images of the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney from mice in various treatments, scale bar=100 nm.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Kurian, 2019, J Clin Oncol, 37, 1305, 10.1200/JCO.18.01854 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Waks, 2019, JAMA, 321, 288, 10.1001/jama.2018.19323 · DOI
  3. Jain, 2020, J Control Release, 326, 628, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.003 · DOI
  4. Khoobchandani, 2020, Int J Nanomedicine, 15, 181, 10.2147/IJN.S219042 · DOI
  5. Pan, 2018, Sci China Life Sci, 61, 415, 10.1007/s11427-017-9262-x · DOI
  6. Zhu, 2018, ACS Nano, 12, 3780, 10.1021/acsnano.8b00999 · DOI
  7. Xu, 2020, Nano Res, 13, 2898, 10.1007/s12274-020-2992-5 · DOI
  8. Serpe, 2012, Nanotechnol Rev, 1, 173, 10.1515/ntrev-2011-0009 · DOI
  9. Li, 2017, J Control Release, 260, 12, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.05.025 · DOI
  10. Midden, 1983, J Am Chem Soc, 105, 4129, 10.1021/ja00351a001 · DOI
  11. McEwan, 2015, J Control Release, 203, 51, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.004 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2017, ACS Nano, 11, 12849, 10.1021/acsnano.7b08225 · DOI
  13. Fu, 2019, Adv Funct Mater, 29, 1906195, 10.1002/adfm.201906195 · DOI
  14. Fulda, 2010, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 9, 447, 10.1038/nrd3137 · DOI
  15. Orang, 2019, Mol Metab, 23, 98, 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.01.014 · DOI
  16. Moreno-Sanchez, 2014, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 50, 10, 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.01.025 · DOI
  17. Sang, 2019, Theranostics, 9, 6209, 10.7150/thno.36283 · DOI
  18. Tiemuer, 2022, Chem Eng J, 430, 132858, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132858 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2019, ACS nano, 13, 10887, 10.1021/acsnano.9b04954 · DOI
  20. Fan, 2018, Angew Chem Int Ed, 57, 8383, 10.1002/anie.201800594 · DOI
  21. Deng, 2018, Biomaterials, 187, 55, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.043 · DOI
  22. Wan, 2018, Biomaterials, 185, 51, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.004 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2018, Chem Sci, 9, 8103, 10.1039/C8SC03386B · DOI
  24. Xiang, 2021, Theranostics, 11, 1953, 10.7150/thno.52997 · DOI
  25. Yang, 2021, Nanoscale, 13, 444, 10.1039/D0NR07484E · DOI
  26. Soto, 2016, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8, 2220, 10.1021/acsami.5b10942 · DOI
  27. Yang, 2021, Biomater Sci, 9, 2230, 10.1039/D0BM01932A · DOI
  28. Han, 2021, Biomater Sci, 9, 7432, 10.1039/D1BM01184G · DOI
  29. Wang, 2017, J Mater Chem B, 5, 4579, 10.1039/C7TB00938K · DOI
  30. Shi, 2015, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 7, 28554, 10.1021/acsami.5b09937 · DOI
  31. Qu, 2016, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8, 34261, 10.1021/acsami.6b13974 · DOI
  32. Zhao, 2022, Angew Chem Int Ed, 61, 10.1002/anie.202113506 · DOI
  33. Shanei A, Akbari-Zadeh H, Fakhimikabir H, Attaran N. The role of gold nanoparticles in sonosensitization of human cervical carcinoma cell line under ultrasound irradiation: an in vitro study. Paper presented at: Journal of Nano Research; 2019. · DOI
  34. Yang, 2019, Curr Pharm Des, 25, 401, 10.2174/1381612825666190123114107 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zuo, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
Jilin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jing
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Published
2022-03
Volume
Volume 17
Pages
989-1002
ISSN
  • 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2013
OpenAlex
W4214871068
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
People's Government of Jilin Province
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
sonodynamic therapy, breast cancer, mitochondrial targeting, mesoporous TiO2, L-arginine, tumor hypoxia, reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, mitochondrial respiration inhibition, ultrasound-triggered drug release, synergistic cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Nitric Oxide, Titanium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review