Smartphone applications for chronic pain management: A critical appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Chronic pain is a common condition with significant detrimental physical, psychological, social, and economic impact.The Institute of Medicine estimates that >100 million Americans suffer from chronic pain, 1 representing approximately one-third of the entire population of the US. 2 Conservative estimates suggest that well over US $500 billion per year is spent in the treatment of these pain conditions, not to mention the lost productivity of these individuals or the burden that their suffering engenders for patients and their families.Despite tremendous efforts, chronic pain continues to be a major societal problem. 1 Smartphones have become one of the most rapidly adopted technologies in the modern history of mankind allowing for previously unimaginable opportunities for communication and access to information.3 Powering this societal revolution is not so much the onboard or attachable hardware for smartphones, but the dizzying array of software programs that use the hardware to add novel functions; we call the unifying software programs "applications" or, more commonly, "apps".While each phone comes with onboard technologies, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, lights, microphones, cameras, accelerometers, and even barometers, it is the development of the app that combines these functionalities to create new and innovative uses for the same hardware for everything from Skype 4 to Pokémon GO. 5 The use of such applications within the health care industry continues to grow, and it is estimated that the market for mobile health apps will grow to US$26 billion in 2017.6 The immense size of this market is due to the functional flexibility that apps can provide.These emerging technologies also provide new opportunities to engage with patients and improve health care outcomes.Studies have shown that mobile phone messaging helps to improve patient engagement outside the clinic or hospital and facilitates self-management of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and asthma, 7 and app-based systems may also be of use in this regard.While the overall market for apps in health care is robust, the market segment for pain management is less than impressive.It is clear that pain is a complex phenomenon and thus requires a multifaceted and multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes.Of the several pain management approaches, the biopsychosocial components to the pain experience have been shown to be the most effective means of treating chronic pain, yet they are underutilized.8 New technologies such as the smartphone apps that have come
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reviews have evidenced that randomized controlled trials evaluating the usefulness of mHealth tools are lacking in the chronic pain literature.
“In fact, although it has been argued that mobile technology (mHealth)—especially the use of smartphone apps—facilitates this paradigm shift towards telemonitoring in chronic pain care, reviews on this topic have evidenced that randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the usefulness of these tools are lacking in the chronic pain literature [39,41,43,44,45].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 47
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research Washington, DC National Academies Press (US) 2011 22553896
- Authors
- Alexander, J., & Joshi, G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alexander, John
- Joshi, Girish
- Venue
- Journal of Pain Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- Volume 9
- Pages
- 731-734
- ISSN
- 1178-7090 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5045217
- OpenAlex
- W2524306000
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- chronic pain, mobile application, mobile health apps, pain management, biopsychosocial model, patient engagement, self-management, health technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review