Cited by 117Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Coprescribing proton-pump inhibitors with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: risks versus benefits

Open access
Gwee, Kok-Ann, Goh, Vernadine, Lima, Graça, Setia, Sajita·2018·Journal of Pain Research

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often coadministered with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to reduce NSAID-induced gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. This coadministration is generally regarded as safe, and is included in many of the guidelines on NSAID prescription. However, recent evidence indicates that the GI risks associated with NSAIDs can be potentiated when they are combined with PPIs. This review discusses the GI effects and complications of NSAIDs and how PPIs may potentiate these effects, options for prevention of GI side effects, and appropriate use of PPIs in combination with NSAIDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/jpr.s156938

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PPIs have also been reported to exacerbate the mucosal damage caused by NSAIDs in the distal portion of the small bowel to the ligament of Treitz.

    “PPIs have also been reported to exacerbate the mucosal damage caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the distal portion of the small bowel to the ligament of Treitz[95,96]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 117

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [79]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease and Dyspepsia in Adults: Investigation and Management London NICE 2014 31935049

Authors
Gwee, K.-A., Goh, V., Lima, G., & Setia, S.
Affiliations
  • Gleneagles Hospital (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Pfizer (Hong Kong) (HK)
Corresponding author
Setia, Sajita
Venue
Journal of Pain Research
Published
2018-02
Volume
Volume 11
Pages
361-374
ISSN
1178-7090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791120196
Cited by
117
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gastrointestinal adverse effects, NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, drug interactions, risk-benefit assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review