The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: a review
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the properties of nanocrystalline silver products (Acticoat) and their applications and examines available evidence supporting their use in wound management. Acticoat utilizes nanotechnology to release nanocrystalline silver crystals. Acticoat releases 30 times less silver cations than silversulfadiazine cream or 0.5% silver nitrate solution but more of the silver released (by Acticoat). Silver-impregnated slow-release dressings release minute concentrations of silver which are quickly bound up by the chloride in the wound exudate. While extrapolations from in vitro and animal studies are cautious, evidence from these studies suggests Acticoat is: effective against most common strains of wound pathogens; can be used as a protective covering over skin grafts; has a broader antibiotic spectrum activity; and is toxic to keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Animal studies suggest a role for nanocrystalline silver in altering wound inflammatory events and facilitation of the early phase of wound healing. Quality human clinical trials into nanocrystalline silver are few. However, evidence suggests using Acticoat in wound management is cost effective, reduces wound infection, decreases the frequency of dressing changes and pain levels, decreases matrix metalloproteinase activity, wound exudate and bioburden levels, and promotes wound healing in chronic wounds. Although there is no in vivo evidence to suggest nanocrystalline silver is toxic to human keratinocytes and fibroblasts, there is in vitro evidence to suggest so; thus these dressings should be used cautiously over epithelializing and proliferating wounds. Future clinical research, preferably randomized controlled trials into nanocrystalline silver technology, may provide clinicians a better understanding of its applications in wound management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Banerjee, I., Pangule, R. C., & Kane, R. S. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201001215 · Cited by 2,749
Extending the TIME concept: what have we learned in the past 10 years?*
Leaper, D. J., Schultz, G., Carville, K., Fletcher, J., Swanson, T., & Drake, R. (2012) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01097.x · Cited by 363
Topical Antimicrobials for Burn Wound Infections
Dai, T., Huang, Y.-Y., K. Sharma, S., T. Hashmi, J., B. Kurup, D., & R. Hamblin, M. (2010) · Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery · doi:10.2174/157489110791233522 · Cited by 265
Che, H., Xu, J., Wu, D., Chen, S., Liu, C., Zhao, C., & Peng, K. (2024) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.11.002 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, J., & Wood, F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-449
- ISSN
- 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118061147
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/nano.2006.1.4.441
- The paper
- Fong, J., & Wood, F. (2006). Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: a review. International Journal of Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2147/nano.2006.1.4.441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.