Cited by 19Pharmaceutical studies and practicesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover trial to examine the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy older adults

Open access
Ermer, James, Richards, Lasseter, K, Adeyi, Corcoran, Martin, Patrick, Stanton, Bev·2013·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic and safety data on stimulants in older adults are limited. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a d-amphetamine prodrug, in older adults. METHODS: In this two-period crossover trial, healthy adults (n = 47) stratified by age (55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) and gender received randomized, double-blind, single doses of LDX 50 mg or placebo. Baseline creatinine clearance, d-amphetamine and intact LDX pharmacokinetics, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Mean (±standard deviation) baseline creatinine clearance in participants aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years was 102.5 ± 26.1, 105.3 ± 23.1, and 94.9 ± 27.3 mL per minute, respectively. In the groups aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years, the mean maximum plasma d-amphetamine concentration in men was 44.2 ± 11.1, 47.7 ± 7.0, and 53.4 ± 19.4 ng/mL, respectively; area under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) was 915.0 ± 164.9, 1123.0 ± 227.0, and 1325.0 ± 464.4 nghour/mL; median time to reach peak plasma concentration was 4.5, 3.5, and 5.5 hours; in women, mean maximum plasma d-amphetamine concentration was 51.0 ± 6.7, 50.2 ± 6.8, and 64.3 ± 12.1 ng/mL, AUC(0-inf) was 1034.5 ± 154.6, 988.4 ± 80.5, and 1347.8 ± 198.9 ng hour/mL, and median time to reach peak plasma concentration was 3.5, 4.1, and 5.5 hours, respectively. d-Amphetamine clearance was unrelated to baseline creatinine clearance. Five participants aged 55-64 years reported treatment-emergent adverse events (versus one each aged 65-74 and ≥ 75 years), and as did six women (versus one man). No trends in blood pressure or pulse changes were seen with LDX according to age. In participants aged 55-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years, the mean change from time-matched baseline pulse ranged from -5.0 to 14.7, -4.3 to 9.5, and -3.0 to 14.7 beats per minute; for systolic blood pressure, from -3.9 to 18.5 mmHg, -2.1 to 14.5 mmHg, and -5.9 to 16.0 mmHg; for diastolic blood pressure from -2.5 to 8.3 mmHg, from -0.8 to 9.4 mmHg, and -0.6 to 9.5 mmHg. Vital sign changes were similar between men and women. CONCLUSION: Clearance of d-amphetamine decreased with age and was unrelated to creatinine clearance. No trends in pulse or blood pressure changes with LDX were seen according to age. The safety profile of LDX was consistent with prior observations in younger adult study participants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s38377

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [3]Biederman J Boellner S W Childress A Lopez FA Krishnan S Zhang Y Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study Biol Psychiatry 2007 62 9 970 976 17631866
  2. [4]Boellner S W Stark JG Krishnan S Zhang Y Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study Clin Ther 2010 32 2 252 264 20206783
  3. [5]Krishnan S Zhang Y Relative bioavailability of lisdexamfetamine 70-mg capsules in fasted and fed healthy adult volunteers and in solution: a single-dose, crossover pharmacokinetic study J Clin Pharmacol 2008 48 3 293 302 18285619
  4. [6]Ermer J Homolka R Martin P Buckwalter M Purkayastha J Roesch B Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: linear dose-proportionality, low intersubject and intrasubject variability, and safety in an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers J Clin Pharmacol 2010 50 9 1001 1010 20173084
  5. [7]Biederman J Krishnan S Zhang Y McGough JJ Findling RL Efficacy and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (NRP-104) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose, parallel-group study Clin Ther 2007 29 3 450 463 17577466
  6. [11]Haffey MB Buckwalter M Zhang P Effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts in adults Postgrad Med 2009 121 5 11 19 19820270
  7. [12]Martinsson L Yang X Beck O Wahlgren NG Eksborg S Pharmacokinetics of dexamphetamine in acute stroke Clin Neuropharmacol 2003 26 5 270 276 14520168
  8. [13]Dolder CR Davis LN McKinsey J Use of psychostimulants in patients with dementia Ann Pharmacother 2010 44 10 1624 1632 20736422
  9. [14]Aging and kidney disease Brenner BM Levine SA Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney 8th ed Philadelphia, PA Saunders Elsevier 2008
  10. [15]Lloyd-Jones D Adams RJ Brown TM Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation 2010 121 7 e46 e215 20019324
  11. [16]International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Studies in Support of Special Populations: Geriatrics. E7 1993 Available from: http://www.ich.org/fleadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E7/Step4/E7_Guideline.pdfAccessed July 27, 2011
  12. [19]Buchholz JN Behringer EJ Pottorf WJ Pearce WJ Vanterpool CK Age-dependent changes in Ca2+ homeostasis in peripheral neurones: implications for changes in function Aging Cell 2007 6 3 285 296 17517039 PMC1974774
  13. [20]Huang CC Sandroni P Sletten DM Weigand SD Low PA Effect of age on adrenergic and vagal baroreflex sensitivity in normal subjects Muscle Nerve 2007 36 5 637 642 17654557

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ermer, J., Richards, Lasseter, K., Adeyi, Corcoran, Martin, P., & Stanton, B.
Affiliations
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Clinical Pharmacology of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Ermer, James
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2013-02
Volume
9
Pages
219
ISSN
1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005376214
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, pharmacokinetics, older adults, d-amphetamine, stimulants, creatinine clearance, age differences, sex differences, healthy volunteers, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review