Cited by 73Ocular Surface and Contact LensAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions

A phase II/III, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study of the safety and efficacy of OTX-101 in the treatment of dry eye disease

Open access
Tauber, Joseph, Schechter, Barry A, Bacharach, Jason, Toyos, Melissa M, Smyth-Medina, Robert, Weiss, Sidney L, Luchs, Jodi I·2018·Clinical ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OTX-101, a clear nanomicellar aqueous solution of cyclosporine, in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial. Subjects were adults aged ≥18 years, with a total conjunctival staining score of ≥3 and ≤9, and global DED symptom score ≥40 (0-100 visual analogue scale). Following a 14-day vehicle run-in, subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to twice daily treatment with OTX-101 0.09%, OTX-101 0.05%, or vehicle for 84 days. Co-primary efficacy end points were changes, from baseline to Day 84, in the total lissamine green conjunctival staining score in the designated study eye and in the global symptom score (both eyes). Secondary end points included total corneal fluorescein staining score, tear breakup time, and Schirmer's test score. RESULTS: <0.01 for both concentrations). All groups demonstrated improvements in global symptom score, but there were no differences among groups. Nominally significant differences were found between the active drug arms and vehicle for corneal staining scores and Schirmer's test scores. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity; no serious ocular adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Both concentrations of OTX-101 met the co-primary sign end point (conjunctival staining) but not the co-primary symptom end point. OTX-101 0.09% demonstrated a notable impact on multiple signs of DED relative to vehicle and was well-tolerated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/opth.s175065

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two Phase III trials from 2016 to 2017 demonstrated improvements in tear secretion, corneal staining, and tear film stability, without serious adverse events.

    “Two Phase III trials from 2016 to 2017demonstrated improvements in tear secretion, corneal staining, and tear film stability, without serious adverse events [212].”

    From From design to Deployment: The innovative role of nanomicelles in targeted ophthalmic therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as [212]

    The Results (Efficacy end points; page not available) report improved Schirmer’s tear-test scores and corneal staining in this single phase II/III trial. They report no significant between-group improvement in tear breakup time, the measure of tear film stability. The Results (Safety and tolerability assessments; page not available) record five serious adverse events, although none was considered treatment-related; the paper therefore does not support the claim of no serious adverse events or of two Phase III trials. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 73

Authors
Tauber, J., Schechter, B. A., Bacharach, J., Toyos, M. M., Smyth-Medina, R., Weiss, S. L., & Luchs, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Tauber Eye Center (US)
  • Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute (US)
  • Toyos Clinic (US)
  • North Valley Eye Medical Group (US)
  • South Shore Eye Care (US)
Corresponding author
Tauber, Joseph
Venue
Clinical ophthalmology
Published
2018-10
Volume
Volume 12
Pages
1921-1929
ISSN
  • 1177-5467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1177-5483
OpenAlex
W2892874106
Cited by
73
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Keywords
cyclosporine, dry eye, dose-ranging, conjunctival staining, lissamine green, corneal fluorescein staining, tear film break-up time, Schirmer test, dry eye symptoms, drug safety and tolerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review