The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Ophthalmology
Open accessAbstract
ISSN 1177-5483 (Online) Aims and Scope Key BenefitsConcise rapid reporting Very fast peer review and decisions upon manuscriptsAll areas of eye disease covered Use of electronic and print media allowing publication in a range of formats Subject areasAll subspecialties within ophthalmology Optometry Visual science Pharmacology and drug therapy in eye diseases Basic Sciences . such as cell biology and genetics. Primary and Secondary eye care Patient Safety and Quality of Care Improvements These areas will be addressed throughOriginal clinical research Reviews of important areas and perspectives Protocols for RCT’s Expert opinion and commentary ‘E-letters’ feature allowing comments on articles published electronically or in print. Quality improvement reports Surgical tips and devices Patient Safety Reports i.e. ideas to make ophthalmology safer. Patient compliance/adherence satisfaction/acceptability, patient education and literacy. Photo essays Case reports Book reviews ‘Personal views’ – i.e. opinion and thoughts from practitioners or patients Likely audienceThis is a general ophthalmology journal and is international. The clinical focus will make the journal of interest to all eye care practitioners . The presence of patient safety and quality improvement reports means the journal is of interest to policy makers and administrators Basic and visual scientists are invited to submit clinically relevant articles and the output will be of some interest to them. Physicians working outside of eye care will also be encouraged to submit relevant workSubmit a manuscript to Clinical Ophthalmology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ocular complications of diabetes mellitus
Sayin, N. (2015) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.92 · Cited by 358
Walline, J. J., Walker, M. K., Mutti, D. O., Jones-Jordan, L. A., Sinnott, L. T., Giannoni, A. G., Bickle, K. M., Schulle, K. L., Nixon, A., Pierce, G. E., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.10834 · Cited by 304
Khanani, A. M., Patel, S. S., Ferrone, P. J., Osborne, A., Sahni, J., Grzeschik, S., Basu, K., Ehrlich, J. S., Haskova, Z., & Dugel, P. U. (2020) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2699 · Cited by 183
(2018) · doi:10.1117/12.2293584 · Cited by 171
Boyle, J., Vukicevic, M., Koklanis, K., Itsiopoulos, C., & Rees, G. (2018) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2016.1274040 · Cited by 119
Fischer, M. D., Ochakovski, G. A., Beier, B., Seitz, I. P., Vaheb, Y., Kortuem, C., Reichel, F. F. L., Kuehlewein, L., Kahle, N. A., Peters, T., et al. (2019) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3278 · Cited by 92
Tauber, J., Chinwuba, I., Kleyn, D., Rothschild, M., Kahn, J., & Thiel, C. L. (2019) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2901 · Cited by 83
RDH5 -Related Fundus Albipunctatus in a Large Japanese Cohort
Katagiri, S., Hayashi, T., Nakamura, M., Mizobuchi, K., Gekka, T., Komori, S., Ueno, S., Terasaki, H., Sakuramoto, H., Kuniyoshi, K., et al. (2020) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.61.3.53 · Cited by 33
Kim, H. M., Ha, S., Hong, H. K., Hwang, Y., Kim, P., Yang, E., Chung, J. Y., Park, S., Park, Y. J., Park, K. H., et al. (2020) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.9.6.20 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Venue
- Clinical ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-03-16
- ISSN
- 1177-5467 (ISSN-L)
- 1177-5483
- DOI
- 10.2147/opth
- OpenAlex
- W4285698150
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
