The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of the epidemiology of overactive bladder
Open accessAbstract
Overactive bladder (OAB) is common in both men and women. It is a symptom complex that causes significant detriment to quality of life in patients. Although the prevalence of OAB is similar in both sexes, there are sex-specific differences in individual symptoms and the impact on quality of life. The coexistence of benign prostatic hyperplasia with OAB can worsen quality of life in men. This review examines the major studies that looked at the epidemiology of OAB as it relates to both sexes. It focuses on both the overall prevalence rates and the incidence of individual symptoms. This paper also addresses the level of bother and quality of life in men and women with OAB. In addition, the relationship between OAB and benign prostatic hyperplasia is reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Al-Danakh, A., Safi, M., Alradhi, M., Almoiliqy, M., Chen, Q., Al-Nusaif, M., Yang, X., Al-Dherasi, A., Zhu, X., & Yang, D. (2022) · Parkinson's Disease · doi:10.1155/2022/2700227 · Cited by 37
Fishing for (in)continence: long-term follow-up of women with OASIS–still a taboo
Schütze, S., Hohlfeld, B., Friedl, T. W. P., Otto, S., Kraft, K., Hancke, K., Hüner, B., Janni, W., & Deniz, M. (2021) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05878-8 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Eapen, R., & Radomski, S.
- Venue
- Research and Reports in Urology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 71
- ISSN
- 1179-1551 (ISSN-L)
- 2253-2447
- OpenAlex
- W2416611247
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.