The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
El Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales: su aplicación efectiva respecto de la vivienda digna en la República Argentina
Open accessAbstract
Este artículo pretende hacer un pequeño análisis de la aplicación del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales, específicamente en lo referido al acceso a una vivienda digna y adecuada en la República Argentina, y la respuesta que ha dado el Estado nacional a través de sus poderes (Poder Ejecutivo, Poder Legislativo, Poder Judicial) y los Estados provinciales mediante sus políticas y sentencias, a fin de alcanzar la concreción de este derecho reconocido internacionalmente en virtud del PIDESC e incorporado a la Constitución Nacional en su art. 75 inc. 22, otorgándole jerarquía superior a las leyes.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This article examines how the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR/PIDESC) has been applied to the right to decent housing in Argentina, reviewing constitutional incorporation (art. 75 inc. 22 CN) and judicial decisions across the national and provincial levels. It concludes that public policies have been insufficient and that effective protection of the right to decent housing has not yet been achieved, with courts increasingly intervening through the doctrine of "control de convencionalidad."
Key findings
- The author concludes that the "políticas públicas" implemented "no resultan suficientes para resolver la problemática habitacional," that the political branches appear "indiferentes," and that "la protección real y efectiva hasta el momento no ha sido lograda," despite an existing legal framework.
- Argentine courts have applied the ICESCR and Inter-American jurisprudence via "control de convencionalidad," ordering concrete housing remedies: in CABA's *K.M.P.* (TSJ, Expte. 9205/12, 21.03.2014) the GCBA was ordered to propose adequate lodging for a 49-year-old unemployed man with HIV; in Buenos Aires' *A., G. C.* (SCBA LP A 71535, 30/10/2013) the province and municipality were ordered to provide adequate housing within 60 days and hotel lodging within 48 hours, plus a monthly subsidy equal to the moving minimum wage.
- The TSJ of CABA later shifted to a more restrictive stance in *Q. C., S. Y. c/ GCBA* (CSJN, Fallos Q. 64. XLVI, 24.04.2012), where the CSJN ordered the GCBA to provide lodging suited to the child's disability and to include the mother in a current or future housing program; the SCBA followed this precedent.
- In Santa Cruz (*Defensoría Oficial Nº Uno de Menores*, Expte. D-15.194/12, 20.12.2013) the TSJ ordered the Executive to regulate arts. 46–47 of Ley 3062 within 60 days, setting a minimum allocation of 50% of the Salario Mínimo Vital y Móvil per child and 70% for children with disabilities.
- In Tierra del Fuego (*Castro, Claudia Rosana c/ I.P.V.*), the Cámara rejected the appeal, holding that the claim should have been brought against the provincial State rather than the autarchic Instituto Provincial de la Vivienda; the author criticizes this reasoning as contradictory.
Methods
- Doctrinal legal analysis (no empirical data collection): the article reviews the ICESCR's incorporation into the "bloque de constitucionalidad" via art. 75 inc. 22 CN, the doctrine of "control de convencionalidad" developed by the Inter-American Court (from *Almonacid Arellano* onward), and ICESCR General Comments No. 4 (adequate housing) and No. 9 (domestic application).
- The paper surveys national and provincial constitutional provisions on housing (CABA arts. 20, 31, 38, 40; Buenos Aires art. 11; Corrientes art. 39; Santa Fe arts. 21, 27; Chaco arts. 29, 35, 42, 59; Neuquén arts. 38, 45, 48; Tierra del Fuego arts. 23, 28; Santa Cruz art. 55).
- Case-law analysis is organized by jurisdiction: CABA, Buenos Aires, Corrientes, Santa Fe, Chaco, Neuquén, Tierra del Fuego, and Santa Cruz, examining how each court applied the PIDESC and CSJN precedent.
Limitations
- The paper states no explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: the analysis is purely doctrinal and qualitative, with no empirical measurement of the housing deficit or of policy outcomes; the case selection is illustrative rather than systematic, so it cannot support claims about the frequency or representativeness of judicial outcomes.
- Evident from the text: the author adopts an explicitly critical normative stance (e.g., describing the political branches as "indiferentes" and criticizing the Tierra del Fuego ruling), and the conclusion rests on the author's interpretation of the reviewed cases rather than on independent evidence.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 Sources not found · 13 No basis given · 11 Not checked yet · 11 Own interpretation · 1 Own result
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Los casos 'GCBA s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: Duhalde, Alejandra Viviana c/ GCBA y otros s/ amparo (art. 14 CCABA)', 60 'GCBA s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: Sarubbi, Rosa Haydee y otros c/ GCBA y otros s/ amparo (art. 14 CCABA)', 61 'GCBA s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: R.Z.B. c/ GCBA s/ amparo (art. 14 CCABA)' 62 y”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Para así decidir, los jueces de la Sala II consideraron que según los artículos 31 y 17 de la Constitución de la Ciudad y el PIDESC, el Estado tiene la obligación de avanzar tras el objetivo de la plena efectividad del derecho a la vivienda, que debe ser adecuada, con criterio de progresividad.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“El Alto Tribunal de provincia sentencia del mismo modo en el caso 'B. A. F . c/P . d. B. A. s/ amparo. Recurso extraordinario de inaplicabilidad de ley' 66 y en 'P ., C. I. y o. c/P . d. B. A. s/ amparo. Recurso de inaplicabilidad de ley'. 67”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“puesto que el Estado provincial no fue demandado en autos.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“En el fallo 'Ekmekdjian c. Sofovich', 6 y adelantándose a la reforma constitucional, ya la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina afirmaba que los tratados aprobados por nuestro país son directamente operativos en el derecho interno e imperativos para los jueces si refieren a derechos humanos.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSJN, Fallos 315: 1492
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Además, el mismo artículo establece un mecanismo para la incorporación de otros instrumentos internacionales a esa misma jerarquía.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites art. 75, inc. 22, C.N.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Es decir, existe pie de igualdad entre la Constitución Nacional y los instrumentos internacionales, formando lo que se conoce con el nombre de 'bloque de constitucionalidad'.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Manili, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dentro de los once primeros tratados que fueron incorporados al bloque de constitucionalidad encontramos el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Asimismo, en reiteradas oportunidades en los últimos años, nuestro Máximo Tribunal ha incorporado a sus sentencias el control de convencionalidad.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites García Méndez, Emilio
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Mazzeo
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Videla, Jorge Rafael y Massera, Emilio Eduardo
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“La provincia de Neuquén 54 establece en su Constitución dentro de los derechos de los trabajadores, en el art. 38, que se garantizan 'condiciones de trabajo que aseguren la salud, el bienestar, la vivienda, la educación y la asistencia médica y farmacéutica'.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 35
In the paper
“En la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, en el caso 'GCBA s/ queja por recurso de inconstitucionalidad denegado en: K.M.P c/ GCBA y otros s/ amparo (art. 14 CCABA)', 59 el Tribunal Superior de Justicia condena al Gobierno de la Ciudad que presente al juez de grado una propuesta para hacer frente a la obligación de brindar a la parte actora un alojamiento que reúna las condiciones adecuadas, teniendo”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tanto la Ley Suprema de la Nación, 44 como las Constituciones provinciales han incorporado en su mayoría la protección de la vivienda.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cuando el expediente llegó a la Suprema Corte de provincia, y esta, teniendo en cuenta lo sentenciado por la Corte nacional en el caso 'Q. C. S.', confirmó la sentencia de Cámara.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“En la provincia de Buenos Aires, la Suprema Corte de Justicia falló en el año 2013 en el caso 'A., G. C. s/ amparo. Recurso extraordinario de nulidad. Recurso extraordinario de inaplicabilidad de ley', 65 la Cámara de Apelaciones en lo Contencioso Administrativo con asiento en La Plata, confirmó parcialmente la sentencia de primera instancia que, en lo sustancial, hizo lugar a la acción de amparo”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Para así decidir, el Máximo T ribunal estableció que el sistema de fuentes aplicable al caso está conformado por la Constitución Nacional, los instrumentos internacionales, la Constitución de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires y la legislación local dictada en consecuencia. De dicho sistema se desprende el reconocimiento de un derecho de acceso a una vivienda digna y el deber de protección de sect”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Para así decidir, estableció que las prestaciones estatales correspondientes a la realización del derecho a la vivienda, a la salud y a la alimentación, no se traducen en contenidos fijos ni unívocos, en tanto dependen del grado de desarrollo de la sociedad, del diseño de políticas públicas y de las propias circunstancias personales de quienes los demandan; extremos que no pueden obviarse a la”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Luego se expidió la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, que hizo lugar a la queja, revocando la sentencia apelada y ordenó al GCBA que 1) Intervenga con los equipos de asistencia social y salud con los que cuenta para asegurar que el niño disponga de la atención y el cuidado que su estado de discapacidad requiere y provea a la actora del asesoramiento y la orientación necesarios para la”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En los casos de jurisprudencia analizados, podemos observar la aplicación de los instrumentos internacionales con jerarquía constitucional, en especial el PIDESC, y la jurisprudencia del más alto tribunal receptada en los tribunales locales”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Debemos tener en cuenta que el Tribunal Superior de Justicia actualmente cambió su jurisprudencia, ya que en el caso 'Q. C., S. Y. c/ Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires s/ amparo' 64 revocó el fallo de la instancia anterior y manifestó su postura restrictiva respecto de la aplicación de los instrumentos internacionales y el modo en que el Estado debe implementar los mecanismos para cumplir”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En atención a ello es que nuestro régimen interno debe estar en consonancia con lo que expresa el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales y los demás instrumentos internacionales enunciados.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Argentina aprobó el Pacto por medio de la ley 23.313, sancionada el 17 de abril de 1986 y promulgada el 06 de mayo de 1986.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ley 23.313
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ingresan directa y automáticamente al derecho interno y deben interpretarse de buena fe.”
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“El Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales fue adoptado y abierto a la firma, ratificación y adhesión por la Asamblea General en su resolución 2200 A (XXI), del día 16 de diciembre de 1966. El mismo tuvo su entrada en vigor el 3 de enero de 1976, de conformidad con el artículo 27.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites resolución 2200 A (XXI)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites artículo 27
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Ese mecanismo ya se ha puesto en práctica al incorporar a esta categoría a la Convención Interamericana sobre la Desaparición Forzada de Personas, adoptada en la Asamblea General de la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA), en Belem, Brasil, en 1994, y aprobada por nuestro país en 1995.”
- Also stated in: § II. EL BLOQUE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDAD 5 Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES · p. 6 · plain
“se le otorga jerarquía constitucional a través de la Ley N° 24.820, también a la Convención sobre la Imprescriptibilidad de los Crímenes de Guerra y de los Crímenes de Lesa Humanidad, aprobada por la Ley N° 24.584 de 1995 y por la Ley N° 25.778 de 2003”
- Also stated in: § II. EL BLOQUE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDAD 5 Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES · p. 6 · plain
“finalmente se incorpora la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad, aprobada por la Ley N° 27.044 el 19 de noviembre de 2014.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ley N° 24.820
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Ley N° 24.584
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Ley N° 27.044
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § II. EL BLOQUE DE CONSTITUCIONALIDAD 5 Y LA PROTECCIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES · p. 6 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Entonces, el reconocimiento de los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales son indiscutiblemente obligatorios, tanto para los individuos como para el Estado.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ello es así por cuanto esta incorporación implica asumir el compromiso de respetar y hacer cumplir en ambos órdenes una extensa nómina de obligaciones vinculadas con los derechos que esos sistemas reconocen y protegen, y cuya eventual inobservancia tiene por efecto comprometer la responsabilidad internacional del Estado.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mantaras, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Este instrumento es uno de los tratados internacionales a los que el país está vinculado con la preeminencia que la Constitución Nacional les otorga conforme al art. 75, inc. 22, C.N. y con superioridad respecto de las normas internas.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites art. 75, inc. 22, C.N.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“El artículo 75 inciso 22 de la Constitución Nacional, además de establecer la jerarquía superior de los tratados frente a las leyes, tiene una excepción, ya que taxativamente enumera once tratados de derechos humanos, estableciendo que tienen jerarquía constitucional, es decir, que se encuentran en igual ubicación que la propia Ley Suprema.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites art. 75, inc. 22, C.N.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“La Observación General Nº 4 ('El derecho a una vivienda adecuada, párrafo 1 del artículo 11 del Pacto') establece qué debemos comprender cuando hablamos de 'vivienda adecuada', interpretando que el derecho a la vivienda 41 no puede ser entendido en forma restringida sino en un sentido absolutamente amplio que incluye el derecho de vivir en seguridad, paz y dignidad.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Observación General Nº 4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“la adopción de una clasificación rígida de los DESC que los sitúe, por definición, fuera del ámbito de los tribunales sería arbitraria e incompatible con el principio de que los dos 'grupos' de derechos [refiriéndose a los DESC y a los civiles y políticos] son indivisibles e interdependientes”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Observación General N° 9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“En tal sentido, especial relevancia reviste la temática de los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales, que por su naturaleza progresiva imponen a los Estados el deber de diseñar, planificar, y controlar programas necesarios para garantizar su goce, siendo una legislación que los proclame insuficiente, si la conducta de los tres poderes no se orienta a permitir el desarrollo integral de la”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSJN, Fallos 330:3248
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“En esta tarea, el Poder Judicial debe tener en cuenta no solamente el tratado, sino también la interpretación que del mismo ha hecho la Corte Interamericana, intérprete última de la Convención Americana.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Bazán entiende que es también imprescindible tener en cuenta que la canalización jurisdiccional de los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales es la consecuencia de que existan derechos genuinos y no meras expectativas, esperanzas o promesas desprovistas de anclaje real.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bazán, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Con el objeto de asegurar el cumplimiento del Pacto, el mismo establece que los Estados parte deberán presentar informes en los que se establezcan las medidas adoptadas para el cumplimiento del mismo.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Artículo 16
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Los Estados parte se comprometen a adoptar todas las medidas legislativas necesarias para el pleno ejercicio de los derechos reconocidos en la Convención, además de abordar las relaciones internacionales de manera que paulatinamente los ciudadanos gocen de los derechos reconocidos (art. 2° y 26 Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites art. 2° y 26 Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nuestra Constitución Nacional en su art. 14 bis, consagra 'la protección integral de la familia; la defensa del bien de familia; la compensación económica familiar y el acceso a una vivienda digna'.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conforme se viene analizando, el control de convencionalidad está ligado a las obligaciones que los Estados asumen al firmar y ratificar tratados de derechos humanos; en este punto, le corresponde al Poder Judicial aplicar los mismos 'en las condiciones de su vigencia'.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paralelamente, significa que el cumplimiento por un Estado de sus obligaciones de adoptar medidas apropiadas se evalúa teniendo en cuenta los recursos -económicos y de otra índole- de que dispone.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El concepto de 'realización progresiva' describe un aspecto esencial de las obligaciones de los Estados en relación con los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales en el marco de los tratados internacionales de derechos humanos.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“En lo relativo a la vivienda digna, el instrumento prevé en su artículo 11 punto 1, 40 que los Estados reconocen el derecho que posee todo ser humano a una vivienda adecuada.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites artículo 11 punto 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“3.- se debe realizar independientemente de que lo peticionen las partes en el proceso.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“el Comité considera que, aun así, es posible identificar algunos aspectos de ese derecho que deben ser tenidos en cuenta a estos efectos en cualquier contexto determinado. Entre esos aspectos figuran los siguientes: a) Seguridad jurídica de la tenencia.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“La provincia de Corrientes 49 en su Constitución establece en el art. 39 que la familia es el núcleo primario y fundamental de la sociedad y goza de las condiciones económicas, culturales y sociales que propendan a su desarrollo y protección integral. El Estado Provincial debe establecer políticas que faciliten su constitución y fortalecimiento, incluyendo el derecho al acceso y la preserva”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“2.- todos los jueces nacionales deben ejercer este control.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“1.- el Juez nacional es quien debe realizar el test de compatibilidad entre las leyes internas y los instrumentos internacionales, comportándose como magistrados interamericanos.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Artículo 11 punto 1. Los Estados parte en el presente Pacto reconocen el derecho de toda persona a un nivel de vida adecuado para sí y su familia, incluso alimentación, vestido y vivienda adecuados, y a una mejora continua de las condiciones de existencia. Los Estados parte tomarán medidas apropiadas para asegurar la efectividad de este derecho, reconociendo a este efecto la importancia esencial”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Además de promover para los jóvenes el acceso una vivienda, 46 también tiene en cuenta a los excombatientes de la guerra del Atlántico Sur residentes en la Ciudad. 47”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“la Ciudad reconoce el derecho a una vivienda digna y a un hábitat adecuado. Para ello: Resuelve progresivamente el déficit habitacional, de infraestructura y servicios, dando prioridad a las personas de los sectores de pobreza crítica y con necesidades especiales de escasos recursos.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“facilita a las mujeres único sostén de hogar, el acceso a la vivienda, al empleo, al crédito y a los sistemas de cobertura social”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Como hipótesis de mínima, debe admitirse que los derechos sociales presentan alguna veta de justiciabilidad que debe ser resguardada para evitar que se diluya el núcleo esencial del derecho en cuestión, punto este que se perfila como un peculiar desafío para el Estado Constitucional y Convencional y para un bien entendido activismo judicial.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bazán, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Los jueces nacionales son -en gran parte- los responsables de aplicar dicho control, pues el ingreso a la nombrada Corte está restringido por el carácter subsidiario de su intervención jurisdiccional.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales se establece que los Estados deben 'adoptar medidas' hasta el máximo de los recursos de que dispongan para lograr progresivamente la plena efectividad de los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“En otras palabras, el Poder Judicial debe ejercer una especie de 'control de convencionalidad' entre las normas jurídicas internas que aplican en los casos concretos y la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En la Constitución de la provincia de Santa Cruz, 57 su artículo 55 expresa que la provincia establecerá un régimen de seguridad social que contribuirá a la construcción de viviendas higiénicas. 58”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La referencia a la 'disponibilidad de los recursos' es una forma de reconocer que la efectividad de tales derechos puede verse obstaculizada por la falta de recursos y que puede lograrse únicamente a lo largo de cierto período de tiempo.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“En la Constitución de Tierra del Fuego, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur 56 se establece en su art. 23 que 'todo habitante tiene derecho a acceder a una vivienda digna que satisfaga sus necesidades mínimas y de su núcleo familiar. A este fin, el Estado Provincial procurará el acceso a la propiedad de la tierra y dictará leyes especiales que implementarán los planes de vivienda'.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“En lo que respecta al núcleo familiar la Carta Magna local dispone en su art. 35 que 'el Estado protege integralmente a la familia y le asegura las condiciones necesarias para su constitución regular, su unidad, su afianzamiento, el acceso a la vivienda digna y al bien de familia'.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“En la provincia de Santa Fe 50 se establece en su Constitución que 'el Estado crea las condiciones necesarias para procurar a sus habitantes un nivel de vida que asegure su bienestar y el de sus familias, especialmente por la alimentación, el vestido, la vivienda, los cuidados médicos y los servicios sociales necesarios' (…) (art. 21).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En opinión del Comité, el derecho a la vivienda no se debe interpretar en un sentido estricto o restrictivo que lo equipare, por ejemplo, con el cobijo que resulta del mero hecho de tener un tejado por encima de la cabeza o lo considere exclusivamente como una comodidad. Debe considerarse más bien como el derecho a vivir en seguridad, paz y dignidad en alguna parte.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Además, muchas constituciones nacionales prevén el logro progresivo de la efectividad de algunos derechos económicos, sociales y culturales.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Al momento de interpretar la CADH, los jueces nacionales deben seguir los estándares de protección elaborados por la Corte Interamericana, estando obligados a su aplicación en el caso concreto.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Además, esa vivienda a la que se refiere debe tener la característica de ser adecuada, es decir, que la misma cuente con lo necesario para el desarrollo, esparcimiento, seguridad e higiene, disponibilidad de servicios, gastos soportables, seguridad jurídica de la tenencia, y debe encontrarse en un lugar que permita el acceso a un empleo, atención sanitaria, escuelas, servicios sociales, de quien v”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Observación General Nº 4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“no puede negarse que el Instituto Provincial de la Vivienda es un organismo que cumple los requisitos para tener legitimación pasiva en el caso en análisis”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ley Nº 19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En el contexto analizado en el presente artículo puedo afirmar que las 'políticas públicas' implementadas no resultan suficientes para resolver la problemática habitacional, que se manifiesta en situaciones similares en diferentes provincias del territorio argentino.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aun en el entendimiento de que existe un andamiaje jurídico referido al acceso a la vivienda digna, se ve claramente que la protección real y efectiva hasta el momento no ha sido lograda.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ IV. DOCTRINA DEL CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD · p. 11
“32 CSJN, Fallos 330:3248, sentencia 13.07.2007.”
§ IV. DOCTRINA DEL CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD · p. 11
“33 CSJN, Fallos 330:3248, sentencia 31.08.2010.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ IV. DOCTRINA DEL CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD · p. 8
“La doctrina del control de convencionalidad tiene su nacimiento en el caso 'Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile' 12 del 26 de septiembre de 2006.”
§ IV. DOCTRINA DEL CONTROL DE CONVENCIONALIDAD · p. 8
“12 Corte IDH, Caso 'Almonacid Arellano y otros vs. Chile', sentencia 18.11.2010, párr. 117 y 124.”
Citations
Cites
Fontevecchia y D'amico vs. Argentina
Humanos, C. I. D. D. (2018) · Derecho Global Estudios sobre Derecho y Justicia · doi:10.32870/dgedj.v0i10.206 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Spaccarotella, S. D.
- Affiliations
- National University of Rosario (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Spaccarotella, Sabrina Daniela
- Venue
- LEX
- Publisher
- Universidad Alas Peruanas S.A.
- Published
- 2017-06-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 77
- ISSN
- 1991-1734 (ISSN-L)
- 2313-1861
- OpenAlex
- W2625886708
- Semantic Scholar
- ba4d97fc1cec518761a15af452ef474ec2d34ee0
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- LEX - REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE DERECHO Y CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Human Rights and Immigration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Keywords
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, right to housing, Argentina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
