Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,760

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics

Open access
KOBAYASHI, Shinya, OTA, Yukinari, HARADA, Yayoi, EBITA, Ayataka, MORIYA, Masami, ONODA, Hirokatsu, ONOGI, Kazutoshi, KAMAHORI, Hirotaka, KOBAYASHI, Chiaki, ENDO, Hirokazu, MIYAOKA, Kengo, TAKAHASHI, Kiyotoshi·2015·Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II

Abstract

The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) conducted the second Japanese global atmospheric reanalysis, called the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis or JRA-55. It covers the period from 1958, when regular radiosonde observations began on a global basis. JRA-55 is the first comprehensive reanalysis that has covered the last half-century since the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts 45-year Reanalysis (ERA-40), and is the first one to apply four-dimensional variational analysis to this period. The main objectives of JRA-55 were to address issues found in previous reanalyses and to produce a comprehensive atmospheric dataset suitable for studying multidecadal variability and climate change. This paper describes the observations, data assimilation system, and forecast model used to produce JRA-55 as well as the basic characteristics of the JRA-55 product. JRA-55 has been produced with the TL319 version of JMA’s operational data assimilation system as of December 2009, which was extensively improved since the Japanese 25-year Reanalysis (JRA-25). It also uses several newly available and improved past observations. The resulting reanalysis products are considerably better than the JRA-25 product. Two major problems of JRA-25 were a cold bias in the lower stratosphere, which has been diminished, and a dry bias in the Amazon basin, which has been mitigated. The temporal consistency of temperature analysis has also been considerably improved compared to previous reanalysis products. Our initial quality evaluation revealed problems such as a warm bias in the upper troposphere, large upward imbalance in the global mean net energy fluxes at the top of the atmosphere and at the surface, excessive precipitation over the tropics, and unrealistic trends in analyzed tropical cyclone strength. This paper also assesses the impacts of model biases and changes in the observing system, and mentions efforts to further investigate the representation of low-frequency variability and trends in JRA-55.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 4,760

Metadata

Authors
KOBAYASHI, S., OTA, Y., HARADA, Y., EBITA, A., MORIYA, M., ONODA, H., ONOGI, K., KAMAHORI, H., KOBAYASHI, C., ENDO, H., MIYAOKA, K., & TAKAHASHI, K.
Venue
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II
Published
2015
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
5-48
ISSN
  • 0026-1165 (ISSN-L)
  • 2186-9057
OpenAlex
W1989120577
Cited by
4,760
References
1
FWCI
200.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001
The paper
KOBAYASHI, S., OTA, Y., HARADA, Y., EBITA, A., MORIYA, M., ONODA, H., ONOGI, K., KAMAHORI, H., KOBAYASHI, C., ENDO, H., MIYAOKA, K., & TAKAHASHI, K. (2015). The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.