Tropical rainbelt, circulation, and sea surface temperatures associated with the Sahelian rainfall trend.
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The long-term downward trend in Sahelian summer rainfall is a unique feature in recent tropical fluctuations and has been associated with SST trends in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.
“Such a long-term downward trend in Sahelian summer rainfall is a unique feature in recent tropical fluctuations, and it has been associated with SST trends in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans (Fol-land et al. 1986;Shinoda and Kawamura 1994;Bader and Latif 2003;Giannini et al. 2003;Lu and Delworth 2005).”
From Tropical Atlantic variability modes (1979-2002). Part I: Time-evolving SST modes related to West African rainfall (2008) · cites this paper as Shinoda and Kawamura 1994
The Introduction describes a long-term decrease in Sahelian rainfall, and the Conclusions link the decline to Indian Ocean warming trends. The Conclusions instead associate the tropical Atlantic SST pattern mainly with shorter-term, interannual variation; our copy also does not establish that the Sahelian trend is unique among recent tropical fluctuations. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Newell, R.E. and J.W. Kidson, 1979: The tropospheric circulation over Africa and its relation to the global tropospheric circulation. In Morales, C. ed.. Saharan Dust, Scope 14, Wiley New York, 133-169.
- Authors
- Shinoda, M., & Kawamura, R.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
- National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (JP)
- ORCID
- Kawamura, Ryuichi
- Venue
- Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-357
- ISSN
- 0026-1165 (ISSN-L)
- 2186-9057
- OpenAlex
- W156231230
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- sea surface temperature trends, tropical circulation, subsidence, Indian Ocean warming, rotated empirical orthogonal functions, rainfall trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review