High-frequency momentum and contrarian strategies in U.S. blue chips
Open accessAbstract
Type of the article: Research Article AbstractA high-frequency enough dataset may be able to identify very short-term opportunities that can potentially generate significant profits. The present study aims to test the performance of momentum and contrarian trading strategies in a high-frequency setting. To this end, tick-by-tick data from Refinitiv (TRTH) are employed, and 288 strategies are tested across a sample of 28 highly liquid U.S. blue chip stocks during the period 2020–2021, a timeframe marked by significant market volatility, notably the COVID-19-induced crash of February–March 2020 and the subsequent recovery phase from April 2020 to December 2021. The analysis reveals that, although certain strategies exhibit superior performance relative to the benchmark strategy both prior to and following adjustments for risk, data snooping, and luck, none outperform the benchmark strategy once reasonable transaction costs are accounted for. These findings suggest that sophisticated retail traders may be unable to exploit underreaction or overreaction in stock prices at high frequency. The main contribution of this study lies in the application of stringent robustness checks, including a robustness check based on luck within the context of intraday trading strategies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio
Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2008) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.03.002 · Cited by 948 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Laly, F.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Laly, Floris
- ORCID
- Laly, Floris
- Venue
- Investment Management and Financial Innovations
- Publisher
- LLC CPC Business Perspectives
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-413
- ISSN
- 1810-4967 (ISSN-L)
- 1812-9358
- OpenAlex
- W4414253355
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Investment Management and Financial Innovations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- high-frequency trading, momentum strategies, contrarian strategy, blue-chip stocks, tick data, transaction costs, data snooping, overreaction and underreaction, retail traders, COVID-19 market crash
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review