Cited by 7Mental Health via WritingSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Effect of guided, structured, writing program on self-harm ideations and emotion regulation

Open access
Fukumori, Takaki, Kuroda, Hiromi, Ito, Masaya, Kashimura, Masami·2017·The Journal of Medical Investigation

Abstract

AIMS: This study investigated the efficacy of structured writing on reducing self-harm ideations and enhancing emotion regulation. METHODS: Japanese university students (N=22) participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the structured writing group (n=10; 70% female), or an assessment only control group (n=12; 67% female). For three consecutive days, participants in the intervention group performed structured writing that included psycho-education and self-reflection about emotions. The Self-Harm Ideation Scale, the Generalized Expectancy for Negative Mood Regulation Scale, and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Structured writing had a short-term effect on expectancies for self-regulation of negative moods and acceptance of negative emotions, but had a limited effect on self-harm ideations. CONCLUSION: This study presents preliminary evidence that increasing awareness, learning, and reflection about emotions resulting from using a structured writing program is particularly useful for regulating emotions. J. Med. Invest. 64: 74-78, February, 2017.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2152/jmi.64.74

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nawaz 2023 provided only a narrative summary of the interventions and included two trials that were common to our review (Fukumori 2017; Roberts 2017).

    “The review authors provided only a narrative summary of the interventions and included two trials that were common to our review (Fukumori 2017; Roberts 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Linehan MM : Cognitive -behavioral treatment for borderline personality disorder. The Guilford Press, New York, 1993
  2. L'Abate L : Programmed distance writing in therapy with acting-out adolescents. In : Schaefer C, ed. Innovative psy- chotherapy techniques in child and adolescent therapy. Wiley, New York, 1999, pp.108-157
  3. Greenberg LS, Paivio SC : Working with emotions in psycho- therapy. Guilford Press, New York, 1997
  4. Kishita N, Yamamoto T, Shimada H : Development of the Japa- nese version of Acceptance & Action Questionnaire -II. The 21 st Annual Conference for the Japanese Association of Health Psychology : 46, 2008

Authors
Fukumori, T., Kuroda, H., Ito, M., & Kashimura, M.
Affiliations
  • Tokushima University (JP)
  • Hiratani Child Developmental Clinic
  • National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research (JP)
  • Nippon Medical School (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Medical Investigation
Published
2017
Volume
64
Issue
1.2
Pages
74-78
ISSN
  • 1343-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-6867
OpenAlex
W2599344838
Cited by
7
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Medical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26380948, 21730563, 17K04420)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
structured writing, self-harm ideation, emotion regulation, acceptance and commitment therapy, negative mood regulation, psychoeducation, self-reflection, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Emotions, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Students, Writing, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review