Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

LLM-Based Human-machine Teaming for Air Traffic Controllers

Suseelan, Sam·2026·International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology

Abstract

Nowadays, the air traffic control (ATC) system is much more complex, and the number of situations in which controllers have to make decisions that can be assisted by intelligent decision-support systems (IDSSs) has grown. Current ATC systems are mainly based on human skills and rule-driven automation, which may have challenges in coping with dynamic operations, unstructured communication, and the growing airspace density. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has brought new opportunities for human–machine teaming, such as contextual reasoning, natural language understanding, and decision-support capabilities that adjust to the context. This paper explores the feasibility of human–machine teaming in air traffic control employing LLM. The study used a qualitative conceptual research approach using literature review and thematic analysis. Existing studies on human–machine teaming, aviation systems utilizing AI, explainable AI, and the field of air traffic management have been reviewed to explore the opportunities, challenges, and safety implications of implementing LLM in an ATC scenario. The results indicate that LLMs can assist air traffic controllers in various aspects, including communication management, procedural guidance, workload reduction, and situational awareness enhancement. The research also identified important problems of explainability, automation bias, reliability, risk of hallucination, cyber security and regulatory compliance. The study recommended a conceptual human-in-the-loop framework for LLM-assisted ATC operations that focuses on enhancing controller authority, introducing explainable AI mechanisms, ensuring system transparency, and designing systems for safety. The study contributes to the ongoing conversation regarding the impact of AI systems on aviation systems and provides a conceptual framework for integrating LLM with collaborative ATC decision-support systems. The results also indicate that human oversight, safety and reliability in system operation are critical considerations for future LLM-driven ATC systems, necessitating careful and transparent integration of AI capabilities to ensure reliable and safe ATC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21590/ijhit.08.01.09

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Suseelan, S.
Venue
International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology
Publisher
MRI Books
Published
2026-01-25
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
122-129
ISSN
2456-1142
Cited by
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LLM-Based Human-machine Teaming for Air Traffic Controllers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21590/ijhit.08.01.09
The paper
Suseelan, S. (2026). LLM-Based Human-machine Teaming for Air Traffic Controllers. International Journal of Humanities and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.21590/ijhit.08.01.09