Cited by 2Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Antifungal resistance and predominance of virulence determinants among Candida albicans isolated from various clinical specimens

Open access
El-Houssaini, Houdaii, Elkhatib, Walid, Elnabawy, Omnia, Nasser, Hebatallah·2019·Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University

Abstract

Candida albicans remains the most common cause of hospital-acquired fungal infections due to its virulence determinants. Resistance to antifungal therapy has increased dramatically, narrowing the few available therapeutic options due to their potential toxicity. However, the association between C. albicans virulence determinants and resistance profiles needs further investigation. C. albicans (n= 25) isolated from various clinical samples were identified. Antibiogram analysis of the tested isolates against different antifungal agents was performed and their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were verified. Virulence determinants including extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, biofilm formation, and cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) were investigated. Correlations between virulence determinants and resistance profiles of the experimented isolates, in addition to their potential association with the source of clinical specimens, were analyzed. All isolates were amphotericin B, nystatin and micafungin sensitive, while 100% were clotrimazole, fluconazole and voriconazole resistant. Extracellular hydrolytic activities were detected in 52, 68 and 100% of the tested isolates for phospholipase, protease, and hemolysin, respectively, while CSH and biofilm production was shown in 24 and 20% of isolates, respectively. CSH had significant (p < /em> < 0.05) positive as well as negative associations with amphotericin B and fluconazole MICs, respectively. Source of clinical isolates showed significant (p < /em> < 0.05) influence on some resistance and virulence patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21608/aps.2019.20210

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Houssaini, H., Elkhatib, W., Elnabawy, O., & Nasser, H.
Affiliations
  • Heliopolis University (EG)
  • Ain Shams University (EG)
Corresponding author
Elkhatib, Walid
Venue
Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 2356-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 2356-8399
OpenAlex
W2940070494
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Ain Shams University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, antifungal resistance, virulence factors, extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, phospholipase, proteolytic enzymes, hemolysin, fluconazole resistance, voriconazole resistance, clotrimazole resistance, amphotericin B susceptibility, nystatin, micafungin, clinical isolates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review