Cited by 1Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyCrustacean biology and ecologyCoffee research and impacts

Effects of Dietary Coffee on Feeding Parameters and Growth of Terrestrial Isopod, Porcellio laevis

Open access
Mohammad, Wafaa, El-Wakeil, Khaleid·2021·Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, B. Zoology

Abstract

Caffeine is considered the most widely consumed pharmacologically active drug. It is probably found in popular beverages (coffee, tea, soft drinks), as well as cocoa or chocolates-based goods. However, it has received a lot of attention there is still much to be learned with respect to its toxicology in animals. Terrestrial isopods are considered one of the most investigated invertebrate groups in soil ecotoxicology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of coffee on feeding parameters and the growth of terrestrial isopod Porcellio laevis. Feeding parameters and growth efficiency were calculated and compared among treated isopod groups. The results revealed decreasing in food parameters such as consumption ratio, assimilation ratio, and egestion ratio in P. laevis treated with different concentrations of coffee. Also, decreasing growth efficiency for this isopod was noticed after exposure to different concentrations of coffee. These results indicate that high levels of caffeine may have toxic effects on P. laevis after a long period of exposure. Further research about the toxic effect of caffeine on isopods is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21608/eajbsz.2021.203498

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mohammad, W., & El-Wakeil, K.
Affiliations
  • New Valley University (EG)
  • Assiut University (EG)
Venue
Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, B. Zoology
Published
2021-10-27
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
173-183
ISSN
  • 2090-0759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-0821
OpenAlex
W3211922120
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. B, Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
caffeine, coffee, Porcellio laevis, terrestrial isopods, growth efficiency, dietary intake, assimilation, egestion, caffeine toxicity, soil ecotoxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review