The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Utilization of Propolis Extract as A Natural Preservative in Raw Milk
Open accessAbstract
Natural antimicrobials have been considered of more importance due to their increase concerns among chemical preservatives among consumers. The effect on the quality of raw milk sample by different concentrations of propolis (5, 10 and20%) in water extract (WEP), stored at 30°C and 5±1°C was evaluated. pH value, titratable acidity and microbiological examination were detected. The addition of 2% water extract of propolis (20% extract) to raw milk resulted in acceptability of the milk up to 12 and 48 hours at 30 and5±1ºC, respectively. Total bacterial count, coliform, molds and yeasts gradually decreased with the addition of more concentration of water extract of propolis (5, 10 and20%), compared with the control. The effect of 1,2 and 3% of water extract of propolis on the characteristics of yoghurt during storage(14 day) at 5±1°C were studied. Titratable acidity of T1 and T2 treatments increased, compared with the control. T3(3% water extract of propolis) resulted in the highest value of total phenolic compounds, flavonoids and antioxidant activity .Sensory evaluation revealed that yoghurt samples fortified with 1 and 2% of water extract of propolis resulted in the best treatments until the end of storage period.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This amount of total phenol was lower than the total phenol obtained in the study of El-Deeb (2017) and Kubiliene et al. (2015).”
From Effect of propolis extract as a natural preservative on quality and shelf life of marinated chicken breast (chicken Kebab) (2022) · cites this paper as El-Deeb (2017)
In the citing paper
“Also, the antioxidant activity (15.83 ± 2.24) and flavonoid content of the current research were lower than those of the study of El-Deeb (2017).”
From Effect of propolis extract as a natural preservative on quality and shelf life of marinated chicken breast (chicken Kebab) (2022) · cites this paper as El-Deeb (2017)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mahdavi-Roshan, M., Gheibi, S., & Pourfarzad, A. (2022) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112942 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Deeb, A.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Center (EG)
- Corresponding author
- El-Deeb, Amany
- ORCID
- El-Deeb, Amany
- Venue
- Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences
- Published
- 2017-08-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 315-321
- ISSN
- 2090-3650 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-3731
- OpenAlex
- W2958367971
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Food and Dairy Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Keywords
- propolis extract, natural preservatives, raw milk, yogurt, antimicrobial activity, storage stability, total bacterial count, coliform bacteria, molds and yeasts, titratable acidity, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, antioxidant activity, sensory evaluation, cold storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review