Cited by 51Sleep and related disordersPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Zaleplon in the Treatment of Insomnia

Barbera, Joseph, Shapiro, Colin·2005·Drug Safety

Abstract

Insomnia is a heterogeneous, highly prevalent condition that is associated with a high level of psychiatric, physical, social and economic morbidity. The treatment of insomnia involves pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. The mainstay of pharmacological treatment of insomnia has been the benzodiazepines, the introduction of which represented a significant improvement over the barbiturates and chloral hydrate. Although benzodiazepines have been shown to be efficacious in treating insomnia, they have also been associated with a number of adverse effects including tolerance, dependence, withdrawal and abuse potential, impairment in daytime cognitive and psychomotor performance (including an increased risk of accidents and falls), adverse effects on respiration and the disruption of normal sleep architecture with reduction in both slow wave sleep and rapid eye movement. In the last decade, the treatment of insomnia has been supplemented by the introduction of a number of non-benzodiazepine hypnotics including zolpidem, zopiclone and, most recently, zaleplon. Zaleplon possesses a unique pharmacological profile, with an ultra-short half-life of about 1 hour, and selective binding to the BZ1(omega1) receptor subtypes of the GABA(A) receptor. This unique pharmacological profile predicts a number of pharmacodynamic properties that account for a unique benefit-risk profile. Consistent with these predictions, zaleplon has been shown in a number of studies to be efficac…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00002018-200528040-00003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of the short/intermediate-acting BzRAs (zaleplon, zolpidem, eszopiclone, triazolam, temazepam) has been shown to have positive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebo-controlled trials.

    “each has been shown to have posi -tive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebocontrolled trials. 32-37”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Montplaisir, 2003, Hum Psychopharamacol Clin Exp, 18, 29, 10.1002/hup.445 · DOI
  2. Terzano, 2003, Drug Saf, 26, 261, 10.2165/00002018-200326040-00004 · DOI
  3. Schwartz, 1999, J Psychosom Res, 47, 313, 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00029-X · DOI
  4. Levin, 1998, Neurosci Behav Physiol, 28, 330, 10.1007/BF02462965 · DOI
  5. Shapiro, 2003, Sleep, 26, A397
  6. Chesson, 1999, Sleep, 22, 1, 10.1093/sleep/22.8.1128 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Holbrook, 2000, CMAJ, 162, 225
  8. Damgen, 1999, Neurosci Res Commun, 25, 139, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6769(199911/12)25:3<139::AID-NRC3>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  9. Noguchi, 2002, Eur J Pharmacol, 434, 21, 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01502-3 · DOI
  10. Sanger, 1996, Eur J Pharmacol, 313, 35, 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00510-9 · DOI
  11. Sanger, 1999, Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 64, 269, 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00081-7 · DOI
  12. Sanna, 2002, Eur J Pharmacol, 451, 103, 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02191-X · DOI
  13. Beer, 1994, J Clin Pharmacol, 34, 335, 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1994.tb02002.x · DOI
  14. Drover, 2000, Clin Ther, 22, 1443, 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)83043-X · DOI
  15. Greenblatt, 1998, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 64, 553, 10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90139-4 · DOI
  16. Rosen, 1999, Biopharm Drug Dispos, 20, 171, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-081X(199904)20:3<171::AID-BDD169>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  17. Israel, 2002, Ann Pharmacother, 36, 852, 10.1345/aph.1A086 · DOI
  18. Walsh, 1998, Clin Drug Invest, 16, 347, 10.2165/00044011-199816050-00001 · DOI
  19. Drake, 2000, Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp, 15, 595, 10.1002/hup.216 · DOI
  20. Elie, 1999, J Clin Psychiatry, 60, 536, 10.4088/JCP.v60n0806 · DOI
  21. Fry, 2000, Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 15, 141, 10.1097/00004850-200015030-00003 · DOI
  22. Walsh, 2000, Sleep Med, 1, 41, 10.1016/S1389-9457(99)00006-4 · DOI
  23. Stone, 2002, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 53, 196, 10.1046/j.-5251.2001.01520.x · DOI
  24. Walsh, 2000, Clin Drug Invest, 20, 143, 10.2165/00044011-200020030-00001 · DOI
  25. Hedner, 2000, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 15, 704, 10.1002/1099-1166(200008)15:8<704::AID-GPS183>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  26. Ancoli-Israel, 1999, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry, 1, 114, 10.4088/PCC.v01n0404 · DOI
  27. Allen, 1993, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 45, 313, 10.1007/BF00265947 · DOI
  28. Rush, 1999, Psychopharmacology, 145, 39, 10.1007/s002130051030 · DOI
  29. Paul, 2003, Aviat Space Environ Med, 74, 1263
  30. Troy, 2000, J Clin Psychopharmacol, 20, 328, 10.1097/00004714-200006000-00007 · DOI
  31. Vermeeren, 1998, Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp, 13, S98, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(1998110)13:2+<S98::AID-HUP54>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  32. Vermeeren, 2002, Sleep, 25, 224
  33. Walsh, 2000, Clin Neuropharmacol, 23, 17, 10.1097/00002826-200001000-00004 · DOI
  34. Verster, 2002, J Clin Psychopharmacol, 22, 576, 10.1097/00004714-200212000-00007 · DOI
  35. Danjou, 1999, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 48, 367, 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00024.x · DOI
  36. Hindmarch, 2001, Hum Psychopharmacol, 16, 159, 10.1002/hup.282 · DOI
  37. Allain, 2003, Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp, 18, 369, 10.1002/hup.500 · DOI
  38. Menzin, 2001, Pharmacoeconomics, 19, 69, 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00005 · DOI
  39. Stillwell, 2003, J Forensic Sci, 48, 1, 10.1520/JFS2002357 · DOI
  40. Roehrs, 2001, Sleep Med, 2, 323, 10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00067-8 · DOI
  41. Hetta, 2000, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 56, 211, 10.1007/s002280000129 · DOI
  42. Garcia, 2000, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 57, 2267, 10.1093/ajhp/57.24.2267 · DOI
  43. Garcia, 2000, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 57, 1137, 10.1093/ajhp/57.12.1137 · DOI
  44. Hojer, 2002, Clin Toxicol, 40, 571
  45. Moore, 2003, Forensic Sci Int, 134, 120, 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00130-0 · DOI
  46. Hesse, 2003, CNS Drugs, 17, 513, 10.2165/00023210-200317070-00004 · DOI
  47. Bhatia, 2001, Psychiatr Serv, 52, 109, 10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.109-a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barbera, J., & Shapiro, C.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Barbera, Joseph
Venue
Drug Safety
Published
2005
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
301-318
ISSN
0114-5916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092946324
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
zaleplon, insomnia, risk-benefit assessment, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, benzodiazepines, sleep initiation, sleep maintenance, adverse drug reactions, tolerance and withdrawal, rebound insomnia, respiratory depression, cognitive impairment, sleep architecture
MeSH terms
Acetamides, Aged, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Pyrimidines, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review