Cited by 106Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Guanfacine: A Review of Its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy in the Treatment of Hypertension

Abstract

Guanfacine, a phenylacetyl-guanidine derivative, is a centrally acting alpha-adrenoceptor agonist, with a mechanism of antihypertensive action similar to that of clonidine. It reduces blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension at least as effectively as clonidine or methyldopa. Like lower doses of clonidine, guanfacine can be given once daily due to its relatively long elimination half-life. Although dry mouth and sedation occur frequently with higher doses of guanfacine, their incidence is lower than with other centrally acting antihypertensives; in addition, other troublesome side effects such as orthostatic hypotension or sexual dysfunction also occur much less with guanfacine than with other centrally acting antihypertensive agents. While a withdrawal syndrome may occur on abruptly discontinuing guanfacine administration, the symptoms are generally mild, and the incidence of withdrawal symptoms appears lower than occurs with abrupt withdrawal of clonidine. Thus, guanfacine is an effective and well tolerated alternative to other centrally acting antihypertensive drugs. Whether its final place in therapy will be as an alternative 'second-line' drug, or as initial monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, remains to be clarified in comparative studies with diuretics, calcium antagonists, and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00003495-198631040-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guanfacine has fewer CNS adverse effects than clonidine, such as sedation, headache, orthostatic hypotension and impotence, and a lower incidence of withdrawal symptoms such as high BP, headache, tremor, restlessness, and nausea (3% vs. 50-80% with clonidine).

    “Also, guanfacine has fewer CNS adverse effects than clonidine, such as sedation, headache, orthostatic hypotension and impotence,42,43 and a lower incidence of withdrawal symptoms such as high BP, headache, tremor, restlessness, and nausea (3% vs. 50–80% with clonidine).42,44–47”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 113 · Cited by 106

Authors
Sorkin, E. M., & Heel, R. C.
Venue
Drugs
Published
1986-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
301-336
ISSN
0012-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029643412
Cited by
106
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
guanfacine, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, essential hypertension, antihypertensive drugs, clonidine, blood pressure reduction, adverse drug reactions, withdrawal syndrome, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, norepinephrine turnover
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Disease, Drug Interactions, Endocrine Glands, Guanidines, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Intestinal Absorption, Kinetics, Phenylacetates, Renin, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Sympathetic Nervous System, Tissue Distribution, Guanfacine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review