How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?: Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health
Abstract
Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.A value of 10000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tudor-Locke and Bassett proposed a classification scheme for categorizing adults based on their daily steps.
“Tudor-Locke and Bassett [33] proposed a classification scheme for categorizing adults based on their daily steps (Table 2).”
From Step Counting: A Review of Measurement Considerations and Health-Related Applications (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
According to the Tudor-Locke and Bassett graduated step index, ERICA participants were classified as 'somewhat active,' averaging between 7500 and 9999 steps per day.
“According to the Tudor-Locke and Bassett graduated step index for categorizing pedometer-determined habitual PA adults, ERICA participants were classified as “somewhat active,” averaging between 7500 and 9999 steps per day [ 34 ].”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 59 · Cited by 2,054
- Authors
- Tudor-Locke, C., & Bassett, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156879797
- Cited by
- 2,054
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 135
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- pedometers, daily step count, physical activity guidelines, physical activity classification, physical activity intensity, sedentary lifestyle, children's physical activity, older adults, chronic disease, body composition, blood pressure, walking clubs
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Goals, Humans, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Public Health, Reference Standards, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review