Cited by 2,054Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?: Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health

Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Bassett, David R·2004·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.A value of 10000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 59 · Cited by 2,054

Authors
Tudor-Locke, C., & Bassett, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2004
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156879797
Cited by
2,054
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 135
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
pedometers, daily step count, physical activity guidelines, physical activity classification, physical activity intensity, sedentary lifestyle, children's physical activity, older adults, chronic disease, body composition, blood pressure, walking clubs
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Goals, Humans, Motor Activity, Physical Fitness, Public Health, Reference Standards, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review