Cited by 336Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Possible Stimuli for Strength and Power Adaptation: Acute Mechanical Responses

Crewther, Blair, Cronin, John, Keogh, Justin·2005·Sports Medicine

Abstract

A great deal of literature has investigated the effects of various resistance training programmes on strength and power changes. Surprisingly, however, our understanding of the stimuli that affect adaptation still remains relatively unexplained. It is thought that strength and power adaptation is mediated by mechanical stimuli, that is the kinematics and kinetics associated with resistance exercise (e.g. forces, contraction duration, power and work), and their interaction with other hormonal and metabolic factors. However, the effect of different combinations of kinematic and kinetic variables and their contribution to adaptation is unclear. The mechanical response to single repetitions has been investigated by a number of researchers; however, it seems problematic to extrapolate the findings of this type of research to the responses associated with a typical resistance training session. That is, resistance training is typified by multiple repetitions, sets and exercises, rest periods of varying durations and different movement techniques (e.g. controlled and explosive). Understanding the mechanical stimuli afforded by such loading schemes would intuitively lead to a better appreciation of how various mechanical stimuli affect adaptation. It will be evident throughout this article that very little research has adopted such an approach; hence our understanding in this area remains rudimentary at best. One should therefore remain cognizant of the limitations that exist in the i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00007256-200535110-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 264 · Cited by 336

Authors
Crewther, B., Cronin, J., & Keogh, J.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Crewther, Blair
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2005
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
967-989
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146115401
Cited by
336
References
264
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
resistance training, strength adaptation, power adaptation, mechanical stimuli, kinematics, kinetics, rest periods, movement technique
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Kinetics, Muscle Contraction, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review