Cited by 150Exercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Marathon training and immune function

Nieman, David C·2007·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Many components of the immune system exhibit adverse change after marathon-type exertion. These immune changes occur in several compartments of the immune system and body (e.g. the skin, upper respiratory tract mucosal tissue, lung, peritoneal cavity, blood and muscle). Of all immune cells, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils and macrophages (of the innate immune system) exhibit the greatest changes in response to marathon competition, both in terms of numbers and function. Many mechanisms appear to be involved, including exercise-induced changes in stress hormone and cytokine concentrations, body temperature changes, increases in blood flow and dehydration. During this 'open window' of immune dysfunction (which may last between 3 and 72 hours, depending on the immune measure), viruses and bacteria may gain a foothold, increasing the risk of subclinical and clinical infection. Of the various nutritional and pharmacological countermeasures to marathon-induced immune perturbations that have been evaluated thus far, ingestion of carbohydrate beverages during intense and prolonged exercise has emerged as the most effective. However, carbohydrate ingestion during a marathon attenuates increases in plasma cytokines and stress hormones, but is largely ineffective against changes in other immune components including suppression of NK and T-cell function, and salivary IgA output. Other countermeasures, such as glutamine, antioxidant supplements and ibuprofen, have had disappointing results and thus the search for companion agents to carbohydrate continues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential pitfalls to long-term training with low carbohydrate availability include perturbations to immune function, impaired training intensity, reduced ability to oxidise exogenous carbohydrate during competition and increased muscle protein oxidation.

    “Despite the theoretical rationale for the training-low paradigm, potential pitfalls to longterm training with low CHO availability include perturbations to immune function [67] impaired training intensity [55], reduced ability to oxidise exogenous CHO during competition [68] and increased muscle protein oxidation [69].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 150

Authors
Nieman, D. C.
Affiliations
Appalachian State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nieman, David C
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2007
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
412-415
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980705794
Cited by
150
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
marathon running, exercise immunology, natural killer cells, neutrophils, macrophages, innate immunity, cytokines, stress hormones, carbohydrate intake, infection risk, salivary IgA, glutamine, antioxidant supplements, ibuprofen, T cell function
MeSH terms
Physical Exertion, Humans, Immune System, Running, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review