Cited by 162Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMedication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical studies and practices

Compliance with Stimulants for Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder: Issues and Approaches for Improvement

Swanson, James·2003·CNS Drugs

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 8-10% of school-aged children in the US and for many individuals persists into adolescence and adulthood. Both pharmacological and nonpharmacological (behavioural) therapies are used to treat individuals with ADHD. Treatment with stimulant medications, which include methylphenidate and amphetamine, typically requires multiple daily doses to maintain efficacy. The frequency of treatment, coupled with the importance of timing of doses and the long-term nature of treatment, make noncompliance a particular issue in the treatment of ADHD. Studies report noncompliance rates of 20-65% with stimulant treatment, although there are only limited published studies and these show considerable individual variation. Noncompliance can arise through inadequate supervision of those receiving medication, leading to delayed or missed doses, or through the reluctance of individuals to take medication, which is influenced by a number of factors (e.g. social attitudes, pressures or worries surrounding medication use and the inconvenience of multiple daily doses). Two approaches are likely to increase compliance with stimulant treatment: effective once-daily formulations of medication and improved treatment information. The development of effective once-daily formulations for stimulant treatments removes the need for multiple daily doses, with the associated problems of ensuring adequate treatment supervision and personal privacy. Improved provision of education and information for individuals with ADHD, as well as their families and teachers, should help them address the issues surrounding stimulant medication and allow full participation in the treatment process. Together, these strategies should improve treatment compliance for individuals with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00023210-200317020-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 162

Authors
Swanson, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, James
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2003
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
117-131
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016995778
Cited by
162
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Celgene
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stimulant medication, medication adherence, methylphenidate, amphetamine, once-daily formulation, timing of drug administration, treatment supervision, patient education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child, Child, Preschool, Drug Utilization, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Time Factors, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review