Cited by 302Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neurobiological and clinical effects of the antidepressant tianeptine

Kasper, Siegfried, McEwen, Bruce S·2008·CNS Drugs

Abstract

The precise neurobiological processes involved in depression are not clear, but it is recognized that numerous factors are involved, including changes in neurotransmitter systems and brain plasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to adapt functionally and structurally to stimuli. Impairment of neuroplasticity in the hippocampus, amygdala and cortex is hypothesized to be the mechanism by which cognitive function, learning, memory and emotions are altered in depression. The mechanisms underlying alterations in neuroplasticity are believed to relate to changes in neurotransmitters, hormones and growth factors. Structural changes in the hippocampus that have been proposed to be associated with depression include dendritic atrophy, reduced levels of cerebral metabolites, decreased adult neurogenesis (generation of new nerve cells) and reduced volume. Increased dendritic branching occurs in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala. Reduced neuronal size and glial cell density occur in the prefrontal cortex. Clinically, tianeptine is an antidepressant effective in reducing symptoms of depression in mild to moderate-to-severe major depression, including over the long term. Tianeptine is also effective in alleviating the symptoms of depression-associated anxiety. It is generally well tolerated, with little sedation or cognitive impairment. The efficacy profile of tianeptine could be explained by its neurobiological properties observed in animal models. Tianeptine…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00023210-200822010-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contribution of neurogenesis in the hippocampus to the etiology of depression and antidepressive treatment has been intensively investigated but is not definitely clear.

    “The contribution of neurogenesis in the hippocampus to etiology of depression and antidepressive treatment has been intensively investigated but is not definitely clear (Kasper and McEwen, 2008;Malberg et al., 2000;Sahay and Hen, 2007;Santarelli et al., 2003).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 302

Authors
Kasper, S., & McEwen, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Kasper, Siegfried
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2008
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
15-26
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015063347
Cited by
302
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 160 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
tianeptine, antidepressants, depression, neuroplasticity, hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, dendritic atrophy, adult neurogenesis, stress, glutamatergic neurotransmission, apoptosis, anxiolytic effects, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Anxiety, Brain, Cognition, Depression, Humans, Memory, Synapses, Thiazepines, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review