Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Calcium Channel Blockers: Differences Between Subclasses

Frishman, William H·2007·American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) share a common mechanism of action. However, the manner in which they exert their pharmacological effects is different between subclasses. Dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs tend to be more potent vasodilators than non-dihydropyridine (non-DHP) agents, whereas the latter have more marked negative inotropic effects. Both subclasses have a similar capacity to lower BP; however, non-DHPs appear to offer potential advantages in the management of patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetic nephropathy. Representatives of both classes are now available in fixed-dose combinations containing an ACE inhibitor, the benefits of which include effective 24-hour BP control, a reduced incidence of adverse effects, and improved adherence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00129784-200707001-00003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Frishman, 1994, Curr Probl Cardiol, 19, 637, 10.1016/0146-2806(94)90002-7 · DOI
  2. Nadar, 2004, Curr Pharm Des, 10, 3607, 10.2174/1381612043382800 · DOI
  3. Subramanian, 1984, Acta Med Scand Suppl, 681, 61, 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb08679.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frishman, W. H.
Venue
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
Published
2007
Volume
7
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
17???23
ISSN
1175-3277
Cited by
52
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review