Cited by 95Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Efficacy and Safety of Ritalin?? LA???, a New, Once Daily, Extended-Release Dosage Form of Methylphenidate, in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Biederman, Joseph, Quinn, Declan, Weiss, Margaret, Markabi, Sabri, Weidenman, Meredith, Edson, Kathryn, Karlsson, Goeril, Pohlmann, Harald +1 more·2003·Pediatric Drugs

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release methylphenidate with a bimodal profile using SODAS technology (Ritalin LA ) compared with placebo in children aged 6-14 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in children meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. Following titration and a 1-week placebo washout period, patients were randomized to 2 weeks of double-blind treatment with either Ritalin LA (10-40 mg/day) or placebo. The efficacy assessments used were the Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales for teachers (CADS-T) and for parents (CADS-P), and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) completed by the investigator. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline (end of placebo washout) to the final rating (end of 2-week double-blind treatment) in the CADS-T Total subscale score. Results One-hundred-and-sixty-one children were treated and 134 responders were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Ritalin LA achieved a mean change from baseline (+/- SD) on the CADS-T Total subscale of -10.7 (+/-15.68) compared with 2.8 (+/-10.59) for placebo (p Conclusion The results demonstrate that Ritalin LA administered once daily for up to 2 weeks achieved outcomes statistically superior to placebo in children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00148581-200305120-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 95

Authors
Biederman, J., Quinn, D., Weiss, M., Markabi, S., Weidenman, M., Edson, K., Karlsson, G., Pohlmann, H., & Wigal, S.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Royal University Hospital (CA)
  • Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (CA)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Biederman, Joseph
Venue
Pediatric Drugs
Published
2003
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
833-841
ISSN
1174-5878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025120697
Cited by
95
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
extended-release methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, once-daily dosing, ADHD treatment efficacy, drug safety, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review