Efficacy and Safety of Ritalin?? LA???, a New, Once Daily, Extended-Release Dosage Form of Methylphenidate, in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release methylphenidate with a bimodal profile using SODAS technology (Ritalin LA ) compared with placebo in children aged 6-14 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in children meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for ADHD. Following titration and a 1-week placebo washout period, patients were randomized to 2 weeks of double-blind treatment with either Ritalin LA (10-40 mg/day) or placebo. The efficacy assessments used were the Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales for teachers (CADS-T) and for parents (CADS-P), and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) completed by the investigator. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline (end of placebo washout) to the final rating (end of 2-week double-blind treatment) in the CADS-T Total subscale score. Results One-hundred-and-sixty-one children were treated and 134 responders were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Ritalin LA achieved a mean change from baseline (+/- SD) on the CADS-T Total subscale of -10.7 (+/-15.68) compared with 2.8 (+/-10.59) for placebo (p Conclusion The results demonstrate that Ritalin LA administered once daily for up to 2 weeks achieved outcomes statistically superior to placebo in children with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stimulant medications such as MPH are known to be effective treatments for ADHD.
“Stimulant medications such as methylphenidate (MPH) are known to be effective treatments for ADHD (Biederman et al., 2003)”
From A Post-Hoc Analysis of Emotional Lability With Delayed-Release/Extended-Release Methylphenidate in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years of Age Participating in Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials (2024) · cites this paper as Biederman et al., 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Biederman, J., Quinn, D., Weiss, M., Markabi, S., Weidenman, M., Edson, K., Karlsson, G., Pohlmann, H., & Wigal, S.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Royal University Hospital (CA)
- Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (CA)
- Novartis (United States) (US)
- Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Biederman, Joseph
- Venue
- Pediatric Drugs
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 833-841
- ISSN
- 1174-5878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025120697
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pediatric Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- extended-release methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, once-daily dosing, ADHD treatment efficacy, drug safety, adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review