A Systematic Data Review of the Cost of Rehydration Therapy
Abstract
Dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is a commonly encountered condition among patients presenting to physicians' offices and hospital EDs. Treatment options consist of oral rehydration therapy (ORT), intravenous rehydration therapy (IVRT) and subcutaneous rehydration therapy (SCRT). Although most patients with dehydration can be effectively treated in an outpatient setting, hospitalization is frequently warranted, with estimated annual inpatient costs for dehydration therapy exceeding $US1 billion in the US in 1999 for elderly patients alone. Although most treatment guidelines recommend ORT as first-line treatment for mild to moderate dehydration, IVRT remains the predominant route of administration for rehydration fluids in the acute care setting in the US. To evaluate the current state of the literature examining costs associated with dehydration therapy, a systematic review of articles published on MEDLINE from 2000 to 2009 was conducted. A total of 20 reports containing pharmacoeconomic data on rehydration therapy were evaluated. Findings suggest that ORT and SCRT may be less costly than IVRT in the treatment of mild to moderate dehydration; however, variability in cost parameters examined or data collection methods described in the literature precluded a comprehensive comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options. Future pharmacoeconomic analyses of rehydration therapy should incorporate time-motion analyses comprising a consistent set of variab…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Financial costs of subcutaneous rehydration are probably lower than intravenous.
“Another systematic review suggests that financial costs of subcutaneous rehydration are probably lower than intravenous, but the systematic review is methodologically poor and the evidence base it collates is of low quality -better-designed studies are needed (266).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [266]
Cites
Frost, G. I. (2007) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.4.4.427 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C., Sobotka, L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pershad, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pershad, Jay
- Venue
- Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-214
- ISSN
- 1175-5652 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025411618
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Health Economics and Health Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- rehydration therapy, dehydration, acute gastroenteritis, oral rehydration therapy, treatment costs, cost-effectiveness, pharmacoeconomics, hospital costs, elderly patients
- MeSH terms
- Dehydration, Fluid Therapy, Hospitalization, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Health Care Costs, Hypodermoclysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review