Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors: Potential Uses and a Review of Haematological Adverse Effects
Abstract
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (mTORis) constitute a relatively new category of immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drugs. These share a unique mechanism of action that is focused on the inhibition of the mTOR. Their clinical applications have recently expanded significantly to cover a wide spectrum of immune and non-immune-mediated disorders, including, apart from solid organ transplantation, various solid organ and haematological malignancies, rheumatological and auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, fibrotic conditions, e.g. pulmonary and hepatic fibrosis, and even metabolic problems such as diabetes mellitus and obesity. The most challenging and frequent adverse effects of the mTORis are the haematological ones, especially anaemia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. A unique characteristic of mTORi-induced anaemia is concurrent marked microcytosis. Recently, mechanisms have been proposed to explain the microcytic appearance of this anaemia; these include globin production defect, erythropoietin resistance, chronic inflammation, dysregulation of cellular iron metabolism and hepcidin-mediated iron homeostasis interference. As the differential diagnosis of microcytic anaemia includes pure iron deficiency, functional iron deficiency and haemoglobinopathies, characterization of the anaemia requires significant investigation, time and costs. Therefore, understanding of the likely interaction between mTORis and patients is valuable in clinical practice. Moreover, this could expand the drugs' therapeutic applications to other disorders, and suggest novel targets for further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Drawbacks of chronic rapamycin therapy include cytopenias, nephrotoxicity, metabolic syndrome, dermatitis, and pneumonitis.
“the drawbacks of chronic rapamcyin therapy – including cytopenias, nephrotoxicity, metabolic syndrome, dermatitis, and pneumonitis [502,503] – are well known.”
From Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [502]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 137 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Sofroniadou, S., & Goldsmith, D.
- Affiliations
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Goldsmith, David
- Venue
- Drug Safety
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-115
- ISSN
- 0114-5916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W107867238
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novartis Pharma
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Keywords
- mTOR inhibitors, microcytic anemia, hematologic adverse events, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, iron deficiency, hepcidin, iron metabolism, erythropoietin resistance, differential diagnosis of anemia, solid organ transplantation, hematologic malignancies, autoimmune disease, fibrosis, diabetes mellitus, obesity
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Autoimmune Diseases, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Hematologic Neoplasms, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review