The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Textile Industry Wastewaters Treatment
Abstract
Effective water and waste management strategies enable us to decrease water consumption and pollution load of wastewaters. Typical examples of low-waste technologies are lanolin recovery in wool scouring, hydroxide recovery in cotton mercerizing, recovery of synthetic sizes and reuse of dye baths. Wastewaters are treated by a sequence of physical–chemical and biological processes. Traditionally, coagulation/flocculation(c/F) has been favored as the first treatment step followed by biological treatment as the second step. More recently a reverse sequence of treatment has been utilized in several cases with success. Novel technologies have been developed such as catalytic oxidation, decoloration by ozone, adsorption/desorption. Their practical use is, however, still rare. Joint treatment with municipal wastewaters has been favored wherever possible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, the dose of coagulants and consequently the quantity of the chemical sludge after biological treatment are smaller compared to those in coagulation followed by biological treatment.57,75,100”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Grau, P.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1991-07-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-103
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review