The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Methanogenic Activity Tests to Characterize Anaerobic Sludges, Screen for Anaerobic Biodegradability and Determine Toxicity Thresholds against Individual Anaerobic Trophic Groups and Species
Abstract
A variety of test procedures have been reported in the literature for determination of the specific methanogenic activity profile of anaerobic sludges and for screening synthetic organic chemicals for anaerobic biodegradability. This paper reviews the methods developed and presents data obtained in the authors' laboratory using test procedures based on pressure transducer measurement of gas pressures in sealed anaerobic vials. Data on the feasibility of freeze-drying granular sludge are also presented as part of a wider study concerning the development of a standard reference sludge for anaerobic biodegradability testing. The use of the methanogenic activity test method to assess the relative toxicity of compounds, known to inhibit methanogenesis, against individual trophic groups involved in the overall digestion process is also described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Methanogenic toxicity and biodegradability tests were performed using a pressure transducer technique (Colleran et al., 1992;Colleran and Pistilli, 1994).”
From Effects of lipids and oleic acid on biomass development in anaerobic fixed-bed reactors. Part II: Oleic acid toxicity and biodegradability (2001) · cites this paper as Colleran et al., 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alves, M. M., Mota Vieira, J. A., Álvares Pereira, R. M., Pereira, M. A., & Mota, M. (2001) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00242-6 · Cited by 163
Anaerobic co-digestion of livestock wastes with vegetable processing wastes: A statistical analysis
Molinuevo-Salces, B., García-González, M. C., González-Fernández, C., Cuetos, M. J., Morán, A., & Gómez, X. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.093 · Cited by 85
Gonzalez-Tineo, P. A., Durán-Hinojosa, U., Delgadillo-Mirquez, L. R., Meza-Escalante, E. R., Gortáres-Moroyoqui, P., Ulloa-Mercado, R. G., & Serrano-Palacios, D. (2020) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101164 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Colleran, E., Concannon, F., Golden, T., Geoghegan, F., Crumlish, B., Killilea, E., Henry, M., & Coates, J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Microbiology, University College, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1992-04-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 31-40
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
