The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Upgrading of Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge by Thermal Pretreatment
Abstract
The effect of thermal pretreatment on the characteristics of degradation of waste activated slduge (WAS) in anaerobic digestion was investigated by laboratory-scale batch and continuous experiments at 35±1°C. The pretreatment temperatures of WAS ranged from 62 to 175°C and the pretreatment times were 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The organic particulates in WAS were solubilized to soluble carbohydrates, lipids and proteins or converted into the lower molecular weight compounds, such as volatile fatty acids, by the thermal pretreatment. Through the thermal pretreatment. the anaerobic degradability of WAS and the gas production from WAS were greatly increased, and the retention time necessary for anaerobic digestion was possible to be reduced by 5 days. The optimum pretreatment temperature and pretreatment time for the upgrading of anaerobic digestion of WAS were 170°C and 60 minutes, respectively. At this pretreatment condition, the COD removal and the gas production were markedly increased. At the digester with retention time from 5 to 10 days, the COD removal efficiency reached over 60% and gas production ranged from 223 to 235ml·gCOD−1 which were about 2 times those of the control. The numbers of methanogenic bacteria existing at retention times from 1.5 to 10.0 days ranged from 107 to 108 MPN·ml−1, and reached the maximum population level at the retention time of 5 days. The increase in solubilization and anaerobic degradation of major organic compounds in WAS by thermal pretreatment decreased in the following order: carbohydrates > proteins > lipids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J. P., & Carrère, H. (2008) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.099 · Cited by 624
Thermal hydrolysis for sewage treatment: A critical review
Barber, W. P. F. (2016) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.07.069 · Cited by 484
Bougrier, C., Delgenès, J. P., & Carrère, H. (2007) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2006.11.013 · Cited by 301
Nges, I. A., & Liu, J. (2010) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.02.022 · Cited by 203
Awasthi, M. K., Ferreira, J. A., Sirohi, R., Sarsaiya, S., Khoshnevisan, B., Baladi, S., Sindhu, R., Binod, P., Pandey, A., Juneja, A., et al. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110972 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y. Y., & Noike, T.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1992-08-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 857-866
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W2317323700
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upgrading of Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge by Thermal Pretreatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.1992.0466
- The paper
- Li, Y. Y., & Noike, T. (1992). Upgrading of Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge by Thermal Pretreatment. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1992.0466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.