The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical Methane Potential of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Components
Abstract
The biochemical methane potential of several MSW fractions was determined in order to compare extents and rates of their conversion to methane. Based on MSW samples analyzed, the methane yield of MSW was estimated to be as high as 0.20 m3 kg−1 VS added, which indicates that more than 50% of the VS in MSW can be destroyed in anaerobic processing. Yard waste fractions of MSW can be expected to exhibit a high variability in yields due to the variety of plant materials which can be included. While some yard waste components, such as grass, exhibited yields as high as 0.21 m3 kg−1 VS, yields for mixed yard waste were much lower, in the range of 0.14 m kg−1. The make-up of the paper fraction can strongly affect the methane yields of MSW due to variations in methane yields of different paper classes. Bleached kraft papers, regardless of coating, exhibited maximum methane yields of 0.37 m3 kg−1 VS, indicating complete conversion. Unbleached kraft paper found in corrugated box-board exhibited a yield of 0.28 m3 kg−1 VS, while newsprint exhibited yields as low as 0.08 m3 kg−1 VS. Inks used in newsprint did not lower methane yields over unprinted newsprint. The paper used in food packaging was highly biodegradable and its degradation was not affected by polymer coatings when samples were finely ground. These results provide a data base on extent and rates of the major biodegradable organic components of MSW and should be considered when contemplating anaerobic bioconversion of MSW.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources
Ward, A. J., Hobbs, P. J., Holliman, P. J., & Jones, D. L. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044 · Cited by 1,527
Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review
Nallathambi Gunaseelan, V. (1997) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(97)00020-2 · Cited by 794
Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components
Veeken, A., & Hamelers, B. (1999) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(98)00188-6 · Cited by 375
Lee, U., Han, J., & Wang, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.016 · Cited by 286
Sánchez, J., Curt, M. D., Robert, N., & Fernández, J. (2019) · The Role of Bioenergy in the Bioeconomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813056-8.00002-9 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Owens, J. M., & Chynoweth, D. P.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W1564570393
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical Methane Potential of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.1993.0065
- The paper
- Owens, J. M., & Chynoweth, D. P. (1993). Biochemical Methane Potential of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Components. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1993.0065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.