The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dye removal using low cost adsorbents
Abstract
Dyestuff production units and dyeing units have always had a pressing need for techniques that allow economical pretreatment for color in the effluent. The effectiveness of adsorption for dye removal from wastewaters has made it an ideal alternative to other expensive treatment options. The current paper deals with an investigation on four low-cost adsorbents locally available in Saskatchewan, Canada for dye removal. Peat, steel plant slag, bentonite clay and fly ash were utilized for this study and their performance evaluated against that of granular activated carbon. Batch kinetic and isotherm studies, and column studies were undertaken, and the data evaluated for compliance with the Langmuir, Freundlich and BET isotherm models. Synthetic dye wastewaters prepared from commercial grade acid, basic and disperse dyes were used in this study and the results showed high removals of acid dyes by fly ash and slag while peat and bentonite exhibited high basic dye removals. For the acid and basic dyes, the removals were comparable with that of granular activated carbon, while for the disperse dyes, the performance was much better than that of granular activated carbon. The results obtained point towards viable adsorbents which are both effective as well as economically attractive for color removal from wastewaters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
dos Santos, A. B., Cervantes, F. J., & van Lier, J. B. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.013 · Cited by 1,155
Removal of dyes from aqueous solution using fly ash and red mud
Wang, S., Boyjoo, Y., Choueib, A., & Zhu, Z. H. (2005) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.011 · Cited by 924
Fungal decolorization of dye wastewaters: a review
Fu, Y., & Viraraghavan, T. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00028-1 · Cited by 910
Self-citationDanish, M., & Ahmad, T. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003 · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramakrishna, K. R., & Viraraghavan, T.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 189-196
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W4211040317
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.