CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GAC Adsorption of Ozonated Secondary Textile Effluents for Industrial Water Reuse

Bergna, Giovanni, Bianchi, Roberto, Malpei, Francesca·1999·Water Science and Technology
DOI 10.2166/wst.1999.0620
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The paper presents the results obtained at laboratory, pilot and demonstrative scale with granular activated carbon adsorption as a mean to obtain effluent suitable as water supply for textile finishing industries, that require very stringent limits in terms of COD and colour removal. Laboratory scale tests evidenced that the specific carbon adsorption capacity, both for COD and colour, is highest for a sand-filtered + clariflocculated effluent and lowest for the sand-filtered + ozonated secondary effluent. Pilot and demonstrative scale tests were performed on three filters (0.3, 0.3 and 20 m3 of GAC each) fed with the full scale ozonated secondary effluent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.1999.0620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bergna, G., Bianchi, R., & Malpei, F.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Publisher
IWA Publishing
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
40
Issue
4-5
Pages
435-442
ISSN
  • 0273-1223
  • 1996-9732
DOI
10.2166/wst.1999.0620
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review