The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of membrane and ozonation technologies to remove color from agro-industry effluents
Abstract
The results of membrane and ozonation experiments carried out on various agro-industry effluents including fermentation (baker's yeast), corrugated board, opium alkaloid and textile dying industries are presented. The experiments were performed using lab-scale membrane and ozonation reactors. Color removals were in the range of 80 to 99% for the membrane treatment studies. Ozonation experiments have shown that color removals in the range of 83 to 98% are possible for the investigated wastewaters. Final color levels were lower than 100 Pt-Co unit, which is quite acceptable aesthetically. The relative unit treatment costs of ozonation were about two times higher than membrane systems especially for very strong colored effluents including fermentation and opium alkaloid industries. The study has demonstrated that both membrane and ozonation technologies are viable options for color removal.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, according to the examples in Table 5, AOP as a post treatment incurs less cost as compared to that as pre-treatment.109,187”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Membrane filtration of biologically pretreated dye wastewater 109 has been occasionally reported to require less cost than that for direct membrane filtration 108 of dye bath, presumably as the former involves less membrane fouling.”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Koyuncu, I., Sevimli, M. F., Ozturk, I., & Aydin, A. F.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 233-241
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
