The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®
Abstract
Treatability of textile dyebath effluents by two simultaneously operated processes comprising adsorption and advanced oxidation was investigated using a reactive dyestuff, Everzol Black-GSP® (EBG). The method was comprised of contacting aqueous solutions of the dye with hydrogen peroxide and granules of activated carbon (GAC) during irradiation of the reactor with ultraviolet light (UV). Control experiments were run separately with each individual process (advanced oxidation with UV/H2O2 and adsorption on GAC) to select the operating parameters on the basis of maximum color removal. The effectiveness of the combined scheme was tested by monitoring the rate of decolorization and the degree of carbon mineralization in effluent samples. It was found that in a combined medium of advanced oxidation and adsorption, color was principally removed by oxidative degradation, while adsorption contributed to the longer process of dye mineralization. Economic evaluation of the system based on total color removal and 50% mineralization showed that in the case of Everzol Black-GSP®, which adsorbs relatively poorly on GAC, the proposed combination provides 25% and 35% reduction in hydrogen peroxide and energy consumption relative to the UV/H2O2 system. Higher cost reductions are expected in cases with well adsorbing dyes and/or with less costly adsorbents.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Combination of AOP with adsorption 91 , membrane separation 139 or other physico-chemical 86 systems may be cost-competitive.”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [91]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Ince, N. H., Hasan, D. A., Üstün, B., & Tezcanli, G.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.2002.0549
- The paper
- Ince, N. H., Hasan, D. A., Üstün, B., & Tezcanli, G. (2002). Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0549