Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®

Ince, N.H., Hasan, D.A., Üstün, B., Tezcanli, G.·2002·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

Treatability of textile dyebath effluents by two simultaneously operated processes comprising adsorption and advanced oxidation was investigated using a reactive dyestuff, Everzol Black-GSP® (EBG). The method was comprised of contacting aqueous solutions of the dye with hydrogen peroxide and granules of activated carbon (GAC) during irradiation of the reactor with ultraviolet light (UV). Control experiments were run separately with each individual process (advanced oxidation with UV/H2O2 and adsorption on GAC) to select the operating parameters on the basis of maximum color removal. The effectiveness of the combined scheme was tested by monitoring the rate of decolorization and the degree of carbon mineralization in effluent samples. It was found that in a combined medium of advanced oxidation and adsorption, color was principally removed by oxidative degradation, while adsorption contributed to the longer process of dye mineralization. Economic evaluation of the system based on total color removal and 50% mineralization showed that in the case of Everzol Black-GSP®, which adsorbs relatively poorly on GAC, the proposed combination provides 25% and 35% reduction in hydrogen peroxide and energy consumption relative to the UV/H2O2 system. Higher cost reductions are expected in cases with well adsorbing dyes and/or with less costly adsorbents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.2002.0549

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Ince, N. H., Hasan, D. A., Üstün, B., & Tezcanli, G.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
46
Issue
4-5
Pages
51-58
ISSN
  • 0273-1223
  • 1996-9732
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.2002.0549
The paper
Ince, N. H., Hasan, D. A., Üstün, B., & Tezcanli, G. (2002). Combinative dyebath treatment with activated carbon and UV/H2O2: a case study on Everzol Black-GSP®. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0549