Cited by 183Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of Viareggio and Treviso plants (Italy)

Bolzonella, D., Battistoni, P., Susini, C., Cecchi, F.·2006·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

The paper presents the results of two full-scale applications of the anaerobic co-digestion process of waste activated sludge together with the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. The experiences were carried out at Viareggio and Treviso wastewater treatment plants (Italy). In the first plant, 3 tons per day of source sorted OFMSW were co-digested with waste activated sludge, increasing the organic loading rate from 1.0 to 1.2 kgTVS/m3d. This determined a 50% increase in biogas production. At Treviso WWTP, which has been working for 2 years, some 10 tons per day of separately collected OFMSW are treated using a low-energy consumption sorting line, which allows the removal of 99% and 90% of metals and plastics respectively. In these conditions, the biogas yield increased from 3,500 up to 17,500 m3/month. Industrial costs were evaluated less than 50 Euro per ton of organic waste, while the payback time was calculated as two years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.2006.251

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding source-sorted OFMSW as a co-substrate to a sewage sludge reactor at Viareggio and Treviso WWTPs increased biogas production from 3500 m3/month to 17,500 m3/month.

    “In this location, source-sorted OFMSW was added as a co-substrate to the reactor treating sewage sludge, obtaining a biogas increment from 3500 m 3 /month up to 17,500 m 3 /month.”

    From Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy (2021) · cites this paper as Bolzonella et al. [67]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bolzonella, D., Battistoni, P., Susini, C., & Cecchi, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Sea Acque S.p.a. di Viareggio, Via degli Aceri 20, 55049 Viareggio, Italy
Corresponding author
Bolzonella, D.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
203-211
ISSN
  • 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-9732
OpenAlex
W1988176800
Cited by
183
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
co-digestion, waste activated sludge, organic fraction of municipal solid waste, biogas production, wastewater treatment plants, organic loading rate, payback period, Viareggio, Treviso
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Anaerobic, Gases, Italy, Metals, Plastics, Refuse Disposal, Sewage, Water Purification, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review