The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants?
Open accessAbstract
Activated sludge treatment allows only for a partial removal of micropollutants, mainly via sorption and biological degradation. Ozonation and activated carbon filtration are processes bearing the potential to drastically reduce the micropollutant load discharged to the environment after (centralized) biological treatment. The estimated total costs between 0.05 and 0.20€ per m3 treated water (depending on plant size and effluent DOC content) represent only a small fraction of the total costs for urban wastewater management and are therefore considered feasible. Full scale testing is currently planned or under way with the aim to a) confirm this cost estimation and b) to demonstrate the benefit by quantification of the effect of removal and by documenting the impact on the ecology of receiving waters. Ozonation would have the additional advantage of achieving partial disinfection. Another issue currently being intensively studied is the byproducts formed during ozonation and their toxicity. Evidence is needed that the formed ozonation byproducts are either harmless or easily degradable. Since a 5% to 20% loss of sewage is occurring due to sewer leakage and combined sewer overflow an improved reduction of micropollutant input to the aquatic environment requires that advanced centralized treatment is complemented with measures taken before discharge into the sewer. Options hereto may be waste design, labeling of compounds according to environmental friendliness or separate treatment of quantitatively significant point sources (e.g. hospital wastewater, nursery homes, industrial wastewater).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sui, Q., Huang, J., Deng, S., Yu, G., & Fan, Q. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.010 · Cited by 462
Application of ozonation for pharmaceuticals and personal care products removal from water
Gomes, J., Costa, R., Quinta-Ferreira, R. M., & Martins, R. C. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.216 · Cited by 429
Libralato, G., Volpi Ghirardini, A., & Avezzù, F. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.010 · Cited by 329
Electro-oxidation of organic pollutants by reactive electrochemical membranes
Trellu, C., Chaplin, B. P., Coetsier, C., Esmilaire, R., Cerneaux, S., Causserand, C., & Cretin, M. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.026 · Cited by 282
Algal Cultivation in Urban Wastewater: An Efficient Way to Reduce Pharmaceutical Pollutants
Gentili, F. G., & Fick, J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-016-0950-0 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Joss, A., Siegrist, H., & Ternes, T. A.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-255
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W2016098004
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.2008.825
- The paper
- Joss, A., Siegrist, H., & Ternes, T. A. (2008). Are we about to upgrade wastewater treatment for removing organic micropollutants? Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.825
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.