Cited by 314Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems

Mercer, Neil, Sams, Claire·2006·Language and Education

Abstract

It is often claimed that working and talking with partners while carrying out maths activities is beneficial to students’ learning and the development of their mathematical understanding. However, observational research has shown that primary school children often do not work productively in group-based classroom activities, with the implication that they lack the necessary skills to manage their joint activity. The research we describe investigated these issues and also explored the role of the teacher in guiding the development of children’s skills in using language as a tool for reasoning. It involved an interventional teaching programme called Thinking Together, designed to enable children to talk and reason together effectively. The results obtained indicate that children can be enabled to use talk more effectively as a tool for reasoning; and that talk-based group activities can help the development of individuals’ mathematical reasoning, understanding and problem-solving. The results also encourage the view that the teacher of mathematics can play an important role in the development of children’s awareness and use of language as a tool for reasoning. We suggest some ways that this role can be carried out most effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2167/le678.0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mercer and colleagues' Thinking Together programme supports the fifth theme, with awareness of good practice achieved through negotiation and display of ground rules integral to their positive findings.

    “While obtaining parallel results with their extended Thinking Together programme, Mercer and colleagues also support the fifth theme: integral to their positive findings was the awareness of good practice achieved through negotiation and display of such 'ground rules' as 'We give reasons to explain our ideas' and 'If we disagree, we ask why'.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 314

Authors
Mercer, N., & Sams, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
Venue
Language and Education
Published
2006-11-15
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
507-528
ISSN
  • 0950-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7581
OpenAlex
W2144863293
Cited by
314
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language and Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Cambridge
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
mathematical reasoning, group work, peer talk, primary school mathematics, mathematical problem solving, teacher role, cooperative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review