Can Modern AI replace teachers? Not so fast! Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Learning: Personalized Education in the AI age
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAI tools enable teachers to become more effective and efficient in their profession.
“The use of GenAI tools for content creation enables teachers to become more effective and efficient in their profession (Kolchenko, 2018).”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Kolchenko, 2018
Teachers' perceptions, attitudes, and levels of AI use influence the scope and effectiveness of the instructional activities they design for their students.
“Moreover, teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and levels of AI use influence the scope and effectiveness of the instructional activities they design for their students (Kolchenko, 2018).”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Kolchenko, 2018
Prior research highlights the importance of designing AI systems that adapt to varied pedagogical practices.
“Prior research also highlights the importance of designing AI systems that adapt to varied pedagogical practices [90, 124].”
From ASL Educators' Perspectives on AI for Enhancing Student Learning in American Sign Language Education (2026) · cites this paper as [90]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot
Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Integrating AI and machine learning in STEM education: Challenges and opportunities
Joseph, O. B., & Uzondu, N. C. (2024) · Computer Science & IT Research Journal · doi:10.51594/csitrj.v5i8.1379 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Gulen, H. N., & Kucuk, S. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14020-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
ASL Educators' Perspectives on AI for Enhancing Student Learning in American Sign Language Education
Hassan, S., Nourian, L., de Lacerda Pataca, C., M Olson, M., D'aurio, T., Agarwal, K., Asad, S. M. N., Tigwell, G. W., & Huenerfauth, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791928 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kolchenko, V.
- Corresponding author
- Kolchenko, Vasiliy
- Venue
- HAPS Educator
- Publisher
- Human Anatomy and Physiology Society
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-252
- ISSN
- 2473-3792 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-3806
- OpenAlex
- W2914180531
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- HAPS Educator (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, adaptive learning, personalized education, teacher role, future of teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
