Cited by 25Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beneficial Use of Carbon Dioxide in Precast Concrete Production

Open access

Abstract

The feasibility of using carbon dioxide as feedstock in precast concrete production is studied. Carbon dioxide reacts with calcium compounds in concrete, producing solid calcium carbonates in binding matrix. Two typical precast products are examined for their capacity to store carbon dioxide during the production. They are concrete blocks and fiber-cement panels. The two products are currently mass produced and cured by steam. Carbon dioxide can be used to replace steam in curing process to accelerate early strength, improve the long-term durability and reduce energy and emission. For a reaction within a 24-hour process window, the theoretical maximum possible carbon uptake in concrete is found to be 29% based on cement mass in the product. To reach the maximum uptake, a special process is developed to promote the reaction efficiency to 60-80% in 4-hour carbon dioxide curing and improve the resistance to freeze-thaw cycling and sulfate ion attack. The process is also optimized to meet the project target of $10/tCO2 in carbon utilization. By the use of self-concentrating absorption technology, high purity CO2 can be produced at a price below $40/t. With low cost CO2 capture and utilization technologies, it is feasible to establish a network for carbon capture and utilization at the vicinity of carbon sources. If all block produces and panel producers in United States could adopt carbon dioxide process in their production in place of steam, carbon utilization in these two markets alone could consume more than 2 Mt CO2/year. This capture and utilization process can be extended to more precast products and will continue for years to come.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1155035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Precast concrete now constitutes up to 30% of the United States concrete market.

    “Precast concrete has been used in US construction projects predating 1920, 109 and now constitutes up to 30% of the country's concrete market.101”
  • The consumption of concrete blocks and cement boards in North America in 2018 was about 6025 and 2950 million units, respectively.

    “The consumption of concrete blocks and cement boards in North America in 2018 was about 6025 and 2950 million units, respectively.101,111”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shao, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Shao, Yixin
Published
2014-06-26
OpenAlex
W2289519110
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DEFE0004285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
CO2 utilization, precast concrete, CO2 curing, concrete blocks, calcium carbonate precipitation, carbon capture and utilization, freeze-thaw resistance, sulfate attack, CO2 absorption, CO2 capture cost, early-age strength, concrete durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review