Cited by 3Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesVehicle emissions and performance

Idaho National Laboratory’s Analysis of ARRA-Funded Plug-in Electric Vehicle and Charging Infrastructure Projects: Final Report

Open access
Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States), Francfort, Jim, USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bennett, Brion, Carlson, Richard, Garretson, Thomas, Gourley, LauraLee, Karner, Donal +9 more·2015

Abstract

Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, managing and operating contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is the lead laboratory for U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity (AVTA). INL’s conduct of the AVTA resulted in a significant base of knowledge and experience in the area of testing light-duty vehicles that reduced transportation-related petroleum consumption. Due to this experience, INL was tasked by DOE to develop agreements with companies that were the recipients of The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) grants, that would allow INL to collect raw data from light-duty vehicles and charging infrastructure. INL developed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with several companies and their partners that resulted in INL being able to receive raw data via server-to-server connections from the partner companies. This raw data allowed INL to independently conduct data quality checks, perform analysis, and report publicly to DOE, partners, and stakeholders, how drivers used both new vehicle technologies and the deployed charging infrastructure. The ultimate goal was not the deployment of vehicles and charging infrastructure, cut rather to create real-world laboratories of vehicles, charging infrastructure and drivers that would aid in the design of future electric drive transportation systems. The five projects that INL collected data from and their partners are: • ChargePoint America - Plug-in Electric V…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1244615

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Idaho National Laboratory (INL), I. F., Francfort, J., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bennett, B., Carlson, R., Garretson, T., Gourley, L., Karner, D., McGuire, P., Scoffield, D., Kirkpatrick, M., Shrik, M., Salisbury, S., Schey, S., Smart, J., White, S., & Wishard, J.
Affiliations
  • Idaho National Laboratory (US)
  • Electric Applications Incorporated, Phoenix, AZ (United States)
  • Intertek (United States) (US)
Published
2015-09-01
OpenAlex
W2471755136
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
  • DOE (AC07-05ID14517)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
Keywords
plug-in electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, hybrid electric vehicles, Chevrolet Volt, data quality, lessons learned

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review