Cited by 609Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy

Open access
Langholtz, M. H., Stokes, B. J., Eaton, L. M.·2016

Abstract

This product builds on previous efforts, namely the 2005 Billion-Ton Study (BTS) and the 2011 U.S. Billion-Ton Update (BT2).With each report, greater perspective is gained on the potential of biomass resources to contribute to a national energy strategy. Similarly, each successive report introduces new questions regarding commercialization challenges. BTS quantified the broad biophysical potential of biomass nationally, and BT2 elucidated the potential economic availability of these resources. These reports clearly established the potential availability of up to one billion tons of biomass resources nationally. However, many questions remain, including but not limited to crop yields, climate change impacts, logistical operations, and systems integration across production, harvest, and conversion. The present report aims to address many of these questions through empirically modeled energy crop yields, scenario analysis of resources delivered to biorefineries, and the addition of new feedstocks. Volume 2 of the 2016 Billion-Ton Report is expected to be released by the end of 2016. It seeks to evaluate environmental sustainability indicators of select scenarios from volume 1 and potential climate change impacts on future supplies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1271651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the 2016 billion-ton report baseline scenario, about 93.1 million dry tons of forest residues and whole-tree biomass from thinning operations and clear cutting will be available in 2022.

    “According to the 2016 billion-ton report baseline scenario (assuming moderate growth in housing starts and low growth in biomass for energy), about 93.1 million dry tons of forest residues and whole-tree biomass from thinning operations and clear cutting will be available in 2022 [7].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 609

Authors
Langholtz, M. H., Stokes, B. J., & Eaton, L. M.
Published
2016-07-06
OpenAlex
W2586879290
Cited by
609
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 10
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
biomass resources, bioeconomy, energy crops, crop yield, biorefinery, feedstock, climate change impacts, environmental sustainability indicators, biomass logistics, commercialization challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review