2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy
Open accessAbstract
This product builds on previous efforts, namely the 2005 Billion-Ton Study (BTS) and the 2011 U.S. Billion-Ton Update (BT2).With each report, greater perspective is gained on the potential of biomass resources to contribute to a national energy strategy. Similarly, each successive report introduces new questions regarding commercialization challenges. BTS quantified the broad biophysical potential of biomass nationally, and BT2 elucidated the potential economic availability of these resources. These reports clearly established the potential availability of up to one billion tons of biomass resources nationally. However, many questions remain, including but not limited to crop yields, climate change impacts, logistical operations, and systems integration across production, harvest, and conversion. The present report aims to address many of these questions through empirically modeled energy crop yields, scenario analysis of resources delivered to biorefineries, and the addition of new feedstocks. Volume 2 of the 2016 Billion-Ton Report is expected to be released by the end of 2016. It seeks to evaluate environmental sustainability indicators of select scenarios from volume 1 and potential climate change impacts on future supplies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the 2016 billion-ton report baseline scenario, about 93.1 million dry tons of forest residues and whole-tree biomass from thinning operations and clear cutting will be available in 2022.
“According to the 2016 billion-ton report baseline scenario (assuming moderate growth in housing starts and low growth in biomass for energy), about 93.1 million dry tons of forest residues and whole-tree biomass from thinning operations and clear cutting will be available in 2022 [7].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 609
- Authors
- Langholtz, M. H., Stokes, B. J., & Eaton, L. M.
- Published
- 2016-07-06
- OpenAlex
- W2586879290
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 10
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- biomass resources, bioeconomy, energy crops, crop yield, biorefinery, feedstock, climate change impacts, environmental sustainability indicators, biomass logistics, commercialization challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review