The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies
Open accessAbstract
This manual is a guide for analyzing the economics of energy efficiency and renewable energy (EE) technologies and projects. It is intended (1) to help analysts determine the appropriate approach or type of analysis and the appropriate level of detail and (2) to assist EE analysts in completing consistent analyses using standard assumptions and bases, when appropriate. Included are analytical techniques that are commonly required for the economic analysis of EE technologies and projects. The manual consists of six sections: Introduction, Fundamentals, Selection Criteria Guide, Economic Measures, Special Considerations for Conservation and Renewable Energy Systems, and References. A glossary and eight appendices are also included. Each section has a brief introductory statement, a presentation of necessary formulae, a discussion, and when appropriate, examples and descriptions of data and data availability. The objective of an economic analysis is to provide the information needed to make a judgment or a decision. The most complete analysis of an investment in a technology or a project requires the analysis of each year of the life of the investment, taking into account relevant direct costs, indirect and overhead costs, taxes, and returns on investment, plus any externalities, such as environmental impacts, that are relevant to the decision to be made. However, it is important to consider the purpose and scope of a particular analysis at the outset because this will prescribe the course to follow. The perspective of the analysis is important, often dictating the approach to be used. Also, the ultimate use of the results of an analysis will influence the level of detail undertaken. The decision-making criteria of the potential investor must also be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1956.
W., W. A., & Goldfield, E. D. (1957) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2281413 · Cited by 1,713
Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables
Hausman, J. A. (1979) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003318 · Cited by 1,372
Market penetration of new energy technologies
National Renewable Energy Lab., G., Packey, D. J., & USDOE, W. (1993) · doi:10.2172/10122752 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Cited by
Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review
Jordan, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2013) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/pip.1182 · Cited by 1,529
NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), G., Davis, R., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), B. T. O. (.-3., Markham, J., Kinchin, C., Grundl, N., Tan, E., & Humbird, D. (2016) · doi:10.2172/1239893 · Cited by 324
Wooley, R., Ruth, M., Glassner, D., & Sheehan, J. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp990107u · Cited by 313
Aden, A., & Foust, T. (2009) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-009-9327-8 · Cited by 306
Techno-economic assessment of open microalgae production systems
Hoffman, J., Pate, R. C., Drennen, T., & Quinn, J. C. (2017) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2017.01.005 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Short, W., Packey, D. J., & Holt, T.
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W1517854909
- Cited by
- 1,075
- References
- 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.