Cited by 311Algal biology and biofuel productionCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Microalgae harvesting and processing: a literature review

Open access
Shelef, G., Sukenik, A., Green, M.·1984

Abstract

The objective of this report is to present a discussion of the literature review performed on methods of harvesting microalgae. There is no single best method of harvesting microalgae. The choice of preferable harvesting technology depends on algae species, growth medium, algae production, end product, and production cost benefit. Algae size is an important factor since low-cost filtration procedures are presently applicable only for harvesting fairly large microalgae. Small microalgae should be flocculated into larger bodies that can be harvested by one of the methods mentioned above. However, the cells' mobility affects the flocculation process, and addition of nonresidual oxidants to stop the mobility should be considered to aid flocculation. The decision between sedimentation or flotation methods depends on the density difference between the algae cell and the growth medium. For oil-laden algae with low cell density, flotation technologies should be considered. Moreover, oxygen release from algae cells and oxygen supersaturation conditions in growth medium support the use of flotation methods. If high-quality algae are to be produced for human consumption, continuous harvesting by solid ejecting or nozzle-type disc centrifuges is recommended. These centrifuges can easily be cleaned and sterilized. They are suitable for all types of microalgae, but their high operating costs should be compared with the benefits from their use. Another basic criterion for selecting the suitable harvesting procedure is the final algae paste concentration required for the next process. Solids requirements up to 30% can be attained by established dewatering processes. For more concentrated solids, drying methods are required. The various systems for algae drying differ both in the extent of capital investment and the energy requirements. Selection of the drying method depends on the scale of operation and the use for which the dried product is intended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/6204677

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rotary kiln drying operated with natural gas, with an efficiency of 85%, was used in the industrial-scale system to drive off the excess water before pyrolyzing the biomass as it represents an efficient and commercially demonstrated technology.

    “Rotary kiln drying operated with natural gas, with an efficiency of 85% [68], was used in the industrial-scale system to drive off the excess water before pyrolyzing the biomass as it represents an efficient and commercially demonstrated technology [69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 311

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Adan B. & Lee E.W. High rate algae growth pond under tropical conditions. Presented at a workshop on waste treatment and nutrient recovery. Singapore, 27-29 February 1980.
  2. Becker, W.E. (1978) Major results of the Indo-German algal project - Arch. Hydrobiol. Beck., Ergebn. Lumnol. Vol. 1. Becker, W.E., Venkataraman L.V., Khanun P.M. (1976), "Effect of different methods of processing on the protein efficiency ratio of .the green algal Scenedesmus acutus", duration Report Int. 14(3), 1976.
  3. Betzer, N. Advanced treatment of oxidat.ion ponds effluent by disinfection. M.Sc. thesis submitted to the Senate of the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology (1981), in Hebrew.
  4. Dodd, J.C., 1980. Harvesting algae grown on p1g wastes in Singapore, Paper presented at a Workshop on High Rate Algae Ponds held in Singapore, 1980.
  5. Heussler P. "Advance and prospects of microalgae culture experiences of the Peruvian German microalgae project" in Proc. of the 2nd Egyptian Algae Sym. Edited by El Fouly M.M. March 1979 -Cairo.
  6. Mohn H.F. 1978. Improved Technologies for Harvesting and Processing of Microalgae and their impact on production costs. Arch. Hydrobiol. Bech. Ergebn. Lemnol. Vol. 11 p. 228.
  7. Shelef G., and Solder C.J. Moraine R., Shelef G., Sandbank E., Bar Moshe Z. & Schwarbard L., Recovery of sewage born algae: Flocculation and centrifugation techniques. In Algae Biomass, G. Shelef & C.J. Solder (eds) Elsevier/ North Holland (1980).
  8. Okamoto S., IEEE 1974. Trans Magnetics 10(3) p. 926.
  9. Okudo T., Sugano 1., Tsugi T. 1975. "Removal of Heavy Metals by Ferrite Copercipitation Technique" Presented at the IEEE Int. Conf. on Magnetics London, 1975.
  10. OswaldJ.W., Golueke C.G. 1968. Harvesting and Processing of Waste Grown Microalgae In: D.F. Jackson, Algae, Man and the Environment. Syracuse Univ. Press p. 371.
  11. Oswald W.J. The engineering aspects of microalgae. CRG Handbook of Microbiology Vol. 2. pp. 519-552 (1978).
  12. Pavoni J.L., Keiber S.W. and Boblitt G.T. The harvesting of algae as a food from wastewater using natural and induced flocculation techniaues. in Watewater us~in :he ~roduction of food &nd fiber -Proceeding pp. 435-496 (1974).
  13. Sandbank E. Harvesting of microalgae from wastewater stabilization pond effluents and their utilization as a fish feed. D. Sc. thesis presented to the senate of the Technion -Israel Institute of Technology (1979).
  14. Schwartzburd L., Polyelectrolytes use for clarification of high rate oxidation pond effluents. M.Sc. thesis submitted to senate of the Technion -Israel Institute of Technology (1978).
  15. Seshadri C.V., Thomas S. 1978. "Low Cost Clutivation and Processing of Algae Utilizing Solar Energy. Proe. National Solar Energy Convention, Bhavanagar. p. 41. Shaw rr~J., Electrophoresis. Academic Press (19'69).
  16. Shelef G., Azov Y., Moreine R. and Oron G. Algae mass production as an integral part of a wastewater treatment and reclamation system. In Algae Biomass, B. Shelef and C.J. Solder (eds) Elsevier/North Holland (1980).
  17. Stumm W. and Morgan J.J. Aquatic chemistry. Wiley Interscience (1981).
  18. Sukenik A. and Shelef G. Algae autoflocculation -verification and proposed mechanism. Biotech. Bioengineer -ln press.
  19. Svarovsky L. 1979. "Solids Liquids Separation" Chemical Eng. July 2 p . 63. Svarovsky L. Advanced in solid-liquid separation II sedimentation, centrifugation and flotation. Chemical Engineering July 16. pp. 43-105 (1979b).
  20. Venkataraman L.V. 1980 "Algae as food/feed" Systems. India Society of Biotechnology. Proc. dat. work. HT India p , 83.
  21. Alg~e r Venkataraman L.V., Nigam B.P. and Ramanathan P.K. Rural oriented fresh water cultivation and production of algae in India. In Algae Biomass, G. Shelef and C.J. Solder (eds) Elsevier/North Holland (1980) •
  22. Wettman J.W., Cravens J.B. 1980. "Cost Effective Lagoon Upgrading with Microscreens" Presented at the 3rd Ann. Poll. Cant. Assoc. Oklahoma Conference June 5, 1980.
  23. Yang L.B., Wing L.K., McGarry M.G. and Grahan M. Overview of wastewater treatment and resource recovery. Report on the workshop on high rate algae ponds. Singapore 22-27 February 1980. Annual Reports of All India Coordinated Projection Algae 1976-81.
  24. Shri A.M.M. Murugappa Chettiar Research Center, Tharamani, Madras, India. Brace Research Inst. "A Survey of Solar Agricultural Driers" Tech. Report T 99, McGill Univ. Canada 1975. Production and Utilization of Microalgae -A Brief Survey -in Proc. of the 2nd Egyptian Algae Sym. Edited by El-Fouly M.M. March 1979, Cairo. SFRI/STR-231-2~gn
  25. Title and Subtitle Microalgae Harvesting and Processing: A Literature Review 3. Recipient's Accession No. 5. Publication Date AUGust 19S4 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rep!. No.

Authors
Shelef, G., Sukenik, A., & Green, M.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Published
1984-08-01
OpenAlex
W1589743119
Cited by
311
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, microalgae processing, flocculation, sedimentation, flotation, algae oil, oxygen release, harvesting costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review